Understanding the Effect of Bias in Fiducial Localization Error on Point-Based Rigid-Body Registration

Image registration is a single point of failure in the image-guided computer-assisted surgery. Registration is primarily used to align and fuse the data sets taken from patient's anatomy before and during surgeries. Point-based rigid-body registration is usually performed by identifying corresponding fiducials (either natural landmarks or implanted ones) in the data sets. Since the localization of fiducials is imprecise and is generally perturbed by random noise, the performed registration is imperfect and has some error. Previous work has extensively analyzed the behavior of this error when the fiducial localization error has zero-mean over the entire set of fiducials. However, if noise has a nonzero-mean or a bias, no formulation yet exists to determine the effect of noise on the overall registration accuracy. In this work, we derive novel formulations that relate the bias in the localized fiducials to the accuracy of the performed registration. We analytically and numerically demonstrate that by eliminating the estimated bias from the measured fiducial locations, one can effectively increase the accuracy of the performed registration.

[1]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  A Statistical Model for Point-Based Target Registration Error With Anisotropic Fiducial Localizer Error , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  D. Hill,et al.  Accurate frameless registration of MR and CT images of the head: applications in planning surgery and radiation therapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Online Estimation of the Target Registration Error for n -Ocular Optical Tracking Systems , 2007, MICCAI.

[4]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Distribution of Target Registration Error for Anisotropic and Inhomogeneous Fiducial Localization Error , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  The distribution of registration error of a fiducial marker in rigid-body point-based registration , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Estimation of accuracy in localizing externally attached markers in multimodal volume head images , 1993 .

[8]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  David J. Fleet,et al.  A method for evalutating CT-based surgical registration , 1997, CVRMed.

[10]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  On Fiducial Target Registration Error in the Presence of Anisotropic Noise , 2007, MICCAI.

[11]  Jianhua Lin,et al.  Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  R. Sibson Studies in the Robustness of Multidimensional Scaling: Perturbational Analysis of Classical Scaling , 1979 .

[14]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Real-time estimation of FLE for point-based registration , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Distribution of Fiducial Registration Error in Rigid-Body Point-Based Registration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Localization and registration accuracy in image guided neurosurgery: a clinical study , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.