A multi-resolution SPH method for fluid-structure interactions

In this paper, we present a multi-resolution smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method for modeling fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems. By introducing different smoothing lengths and time steps, the spatio-temporal discretization is applied with different resolutions for fluid and structure. To ensure momentum conservation at the fluid-structure coupling, a position-based Verlet time integration scheme is introduced. Furthermore, the time-averaged velocity and acceleration of solid particles are introduced to enhance force matching in the fluid and solid equations. A set of numerical examples including several bio-mechanical problems are considered to demonstrate the efficiency, accuracy and robustness of the present method. A open-source code for all the examples is also provided.

[1]  Benedict D. Rogers,et al.  Wave body interaction in 2D using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with variable particle mass , 2012 .

[2]  Xiang Chen,et al.  Numerical Study of 3-D Liquid Sloshing in an Elastic Tank by MPS-FEM Coupled Method , 2019, Journal of Ship Research.

[3]  Leigh McCue,et al.  Free-surface flow interactions with deformable structures using an SPH–FEM model , 2012 .

[4]  Hu Dai,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Chi Zhang,et al.  A weakly compressible SPH method for violent multi-phase flows with high density ratio , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Flexible filaments in a flowing soap film as a model for one-dimensional flags in a two-dimensional wind , 2000, Nature.

[7]  Dan Negrut,et al.  A consistent spatially adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for fluid–structure interactions , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[8]  Brahmeshwar Mishra,et al.  The discrete element method for the simulation of ball mills , 1992 .

[9]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  A generalized transport-velocity formulation for smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[11]  S. Mittal,et al.  A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure. II: Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders , 1992 .

[12]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  E. Oñate,et al.  A FINITE POINT METHOD IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS. APPLICATIONS TO CONVECTIVE TRANSPORT AND FLUID FLOW , 1996 .

[14]  W. X. Wang,et al.  Isoparametric finite point method in computational mechanics , 2003 .

[15]  Moubin Liu,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for modeling fluid-structure interactions , 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy.

[16]  J. Owen,et al.  Adaptive Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Methodology. II. , 1995, astro-ph/9512078.

[17]  George E. Karniadakis,et al.  Multi-resolution flow simulations by smoothed particle hydrodynamics via domain decomposition , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  S. Koshizuka,et al.  Moving-Particle Semi-Implicit Method for Fragmentation of Incompressible Fluid , 1996 .

[19]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  A weakly compressible SPH method with WENO reconstruction , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  Benedict D. Rogers,et al.  Variable resolution for SPH: A dynamic particle coalescing and splitting scheme , 2013 .

[21]  Rade Vignjevic,et al.  SPH in a Total Lagrangian Formalism , 2006 .

[22]  Luciano Teresi,et al.  Modeling and simulation of fish swimming with active muscles. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Krish Thiagarajan,et al.  An SPH projection method for simulating fluid-hypoelastic structure interaction , 2009 .

[24]  Fei Xu,et al.  SPH scheme for simulating the water entry of an elastomer , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[25]  Chi Zhang,et al.  SPHinXsys: An open-source meshless, multi-resolution and multi-physics library , 2020, Softw. Impacts.

[26]  C. Loudon,et al.  The use of the dimensionless Womersley number to characterize the unsteady nature of internal flow. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Xiangyu Hu,et al.  SPH modeling of fluid-structure interaction , 2018 .

[28]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[29]  F. Rosendaal,et al.  The Effect of Aging on Venous Valves , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[30]  D. Wan,et al.  MPS-FEM Coupled Method for Fluid–Structure Interaction in 3D Dam-Break Flows , 2018, International Journal of Computational Methods.

[31]  C. Antoci,et al.  Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH , 2007 .

[32]  Moubin Liu,et al.  A smoothed particle element method (SPEM) for modeling fluid–structure interaction problems with large fluid deformations , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[33]  David Le Touzé,et al.  Adaptive particle refinement and derefinement applied to the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[34]  P. M. Guilcher,et al.  Simulations of Hydro-Elastic Impacts Using a Parallel SPH Model , 2010 .

[35]  A. Zhang,et al.  Study of a complex fluid-structure dam-breaking benchmark problem using a multi-phase SPH method with APR , 2019, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements.

[36]  Chi Zhang,et al.  Dual-criteria time stepping for weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[37]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[38]  R. Ogden Non-Linear Elastic Deformations , 1984 .

[39]  Hitoshi Gotoh,et al.  Multi-resolution MPS for incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions in ocean engineering , 2019, Applied Ocean Research.

[40]  Bing Ren,et al.  SPH-DEM Modeling of the Hydraulic Stability of 2D Blocks on a Slope , 2014 .

[41]  M. Lastiwka,et al.  Adaptive particle distribution for smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[42]  R. Mittal,et al.  Benchmarking a Coupled Immersed-Boundary-Finite-Element Solver for Large-Scale Flow-Induced Deformation , 2012 .

[43]  Moubin Liu,et al.  Numerical simulation of hydro-elastic problems with smoothed particle hydrodynamics method , 2013 .

[44]  Hitoshi Gotoh,et al.  An enhanced ISPH-SPH coupled method for simulation of incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions , 2018, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[45]  David Le Touzé,et al.  An efficient FSI coupling strategy between Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Finite Element methods , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[46]  J. Morris,et al.  Modeling Low Reynolds Number Incompressible Flows Using SPH , 1997 .

[47]  J. Monaghan Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH , 1994 .

[48]  L. Lucy A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[49]  Bingyin Zhang,et al.  A stabilized TL–WC SPH approach with GPU acceleration for three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction , 2019, Journal of Fluids and Structures.

[50]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  A weakly compressible SPH method based on a low-dissipation Riemann solver , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[51]  Hyung Jin Sung,et al.  Simulation of flexible filaments in a uniform flow by the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[52]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.