Recreational Swimming Benefits of New Hampshire Lake Water Quality Policies: An Application of a Repeated Discrete Choice Model

Water pollution control policies generally direct sources (i.e., industry, agriculture) to reduce loadings of certain pollutants. Thus, evaluating the relative net recreation benefits of policies to improve water quality requires establishing a linkage between the sources, the resultant water quality degradation at the affected water bodies, and, ultimately, the effect on recreation behavior. This linkage is rarely present in the empirical literature which is, thus, deficient for water pollution control policy assessment purposes. In this paper, we estimate the relative recreational swimming benefits that may result from controlling point and nonpoint sources of pollution, respectively, in New Hampshire's lakes. We use a repeated discrete choice framework to model swimming behavior as a function of each lake's level of eutrophication, bacteria, and oil and grease. For each pollutant, at each affected lake, we identify which source is responsible for the pollution, and we conduct scenarios controlling each pollution source independently, and then, taken together. Seasonal benefit estimates are presented for each scenario. Coupled with information on the most cost effective means of generating the scenarios, these estimates provide a useful starting point for a quantitative assessment of the net recreation benefits of policies to improve the quality of New Hampshire lakes.

[1]  E. Morey TWO RUMs unCLOAKED : Nested-Logit Models of Site Choice and Nested-Logit Models of Participation and Site Choice , 1997 .

[2]  Stephen H. Jones,et al.  Assessment of nonpoint source pollution in tributaries entering Great Bay : a final report to the New Hampshire Office of State Planning, New Hampshire Coastal Program , 1996 .

[3]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Using Random Utility Models to Estimate the Recreational Value of Estuarine Resources , 1995 .

[4]  A. Freeman The Economics of Valuing Marine Recreation: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 1994 .

[5]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 1993 .

[6]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Randomly Drawn Opportunity Sets in a Random Utility Model of Lake Recreation , 1992 .

[7]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Site Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1992 .

[8]  John P. Hoehn,et al.  Valuing the Multidimensional Impacts of Environmental Policy: Theory and Methods , 1991 .

[9]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates , 1990 .

[10]  N. Bockstael,et al.  A Random Utility Model for Sportfishing: Some Preliminary Results for Florida , 1989, Marine Resource Economics.

[11]  T. Cameron The Determinants of Value for a Marine Estuarine Sportfishery: The Effects of Water Quality in Texas Bays , 1988 .

[12]  S. C. Matulich,et al.  Recreation Economics: Taking Stock , 1987 .

[13]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF NESTED LOGIT MODELS , 1985 .

[14]  K. McConnell,et al.  Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Reply , 1983 .

[15]  W. Hanemann Applied Welfare Analysis with Qualitative Response Models , 1982 .

[16]  Ivar E. Strand,et al.  Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: An Application to Sportfishing , 1981 .

[17]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .