Aggregation Improves Learning: Experiments in Natural Language Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

To improve the interaction between students and an intelligent tutoring system, we developed two Natural Language generators, that we systematically evaluated in a three way comparison that included the original system as well. We found that the generator which intuitively produces the best language does engender the most learning. Specifically, it appears that functional aggregation is responsible for the improvement.

[1]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Spoken Versus Typed Human and Computer Dialogue Tutoring , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[2]  Ehud Reiter,et al.  Book Reviews: Building Natural Language Generation Systems , 2000, CL.

[3]  Stuart C. Shapiro.  SNePS: a logic for natural language understanding and commonsense reasoning , 2000 .

[4]  Sandra Carberry,et al.  Integrating Text Plans for Conciseness and Coherence , 1998, COLING-ACL.

[5]  James C. Lester,et al.  Developing and Empirically Evaluating Robust Explanation Generators: The KNIGHT Experiments , 1997, Comput. Linguistics.

[6]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Influence of Argument Conciseness on Argument Effectiveness , 2000, ACL.

[7]  A. Graesser,et al.  LEARNING WHILE HOLDING A CONVERSATION WITH A COMPUTER , 2005 .

[8]  Chris Mellish,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Generation of Anaphora in Chinese , 1997, Comput. Linguistics.

[9]  Helmut Horacek.  Aggregation with Strong Regularities and Alternatives" , 2002, INLG.

[10]  José Coch.  Evaluating and comparing three text-production techniques , 1996, COLING.

[11]  Douglas M. Towne.  Approximate Reasoning Techniques for Intelligent Diagnostic Instruction , 1997 .

[12]  Michael White,et al.  EXEMPLARS: A Practical, Extensible Framework For Dynamic Text Generation , 1998, INLG.

[13]  James Shaw.  A Corpus-based Analysis for the Ordering of Clause Aggregation Operators , 2002, COLING.

[14]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  The DIAG experiments: Natural Language Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2002, INLG.

[15]  Robert Dale,et al.  Building Natural Language Generation Systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing) , 2006 .

[16]  Davide Fossati,et al.  Natural Language Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: a case study , 2005, AIED.

[17]  Ehud Reiter,et al.  Lessons from a failure: Generating tailored smoking cessation letters , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[18]  R. Michael Young,et al.  Using Grice's maxim of Quantity to select the content of plan descriptions , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[19]  M. Reape,et al.  Just what is aggregation anyway ? , 2007 .

[20]  Xiaorong Huang,et al.  Paraphrasing and Aggregating Argumentative Texts Using Text Structure , 1996, INLG.

[21]  Benoit Lavoie,et al.  A Fast and Portable Realizer for Text Generation Systems , 1997, ANLP.