Combined Feedback-Feed Forward Control Strategy for a Knee Rehabilitation Device with Soft Actuation

Assistive devices for rehabilitation purposes have gained much attention in robotics research. Using actuation systems that include compliant elements, provide advantages such as natural motions of robotic devices and safety in the interaction with people. These actuation systems are called soft actuators. There are parallel elastic actuators (PEA), series elastic actuators (SEA) and variable stiffness actuators (VSA), which differ among them by the position of the compliant element and the possibility of changing the stiffness online. We have designed a five-bar-linkage knee rehabilitation system which uses the advantages of soft actuation. To accomplish desired tasks in a proper manner, using automatic systems, control strategies are required. In our case, this means to reproduce the desired motions without affecting the patient. In this way, the control system is crucial. In this chapter, we present a combined feedback-feedforward control strategy for the knee rehabilitation device designed. This work was partially presented before in [16], where we discussed the strategy and presented some simulation results. In this chapter we extend the results, presenting experimental trials to validate the performance of the controller and the behavior of the system. The goal of the proposed strategy is to control the system while maintaining the intrinsic softness of the actuators when the patient is in the rehabilitation process. The feedback control strategy acts in a defined threshold to maintain the stiffness of the system, and it is combined with a feed-forward decision control to reject disturbances. The simulations and the experimental results presented are obtained from the analysis of a One-Degree-of-Freedom (DoF) soft actuated system, to allow us to have an insight of the controller and the system, without losing generality.

[1]  Cosimo Della Santina,et al.  Design, control and validation of the variable stiffness exoskeleton FLExo , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[2]  Agathe Koller-Hodac,et al.  A novel robotic device for knee rehabilitation improved physical therapy through automated process , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Variable stiffness actuators: The user’s point of view , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Alexandra Velasco,et al.  Soft-Actuated Modular Knee-Rehabilitation Device: Proof of Concept , 2017, ICBRA.

[5]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  A PD-type regulator with exact gravity cancellation for robots with flexible joints , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Controlling Soft Robots: Balancing Feedback and Feedforward Elements , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Optimal control strategies for maximizing the performance of Variable Stiffness Joints with nonlinear springs , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Mergen H. Ghayesh,et al.  Impedance Control of an Intrinsically Compliant Parallel Ankle Rehabilitation Robot , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Immersion and invariance control for an antagonistic joint with nonlinear mechanical stiffness , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[10]  Steven H. Collins,et al.  Design of a lightweight, tethered, torque-controlled knee exoskeleton , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[11]  Jiping He,et al.  RUPERT: An exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions , 2008, 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[12]  C. Lorish,et al.  Promoting patient cooperation with exercise programs: linking research, theory, and practice. , 1994, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[13]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  VSA-CubeBot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Backstepping Control of Variable Stiffness Robots , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[15]  David Baiden,et al.  Assistive control of motion therapy devices based on pneumatic soft-actuators with rotary elastic chambers , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[16]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  EXiO—A Brain-Controlled Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Rhesus Macaques , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  State feedback damping control for a multi DOF variable stiffness robot arm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[19]  Alexandra Velasco,et al.  Knee Rehabilitation Device with Soft Actuation: An Approach to the Motion Control. , 2018 .

[20]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.