Allocation of emission permits for China’s power plants: A systemic Pareto optimal method

Allocation of emission permits (AEP) is an important issue because of its significant effects on environmental governance and operations management. However, whether AEP results can constantly maintain systemic Pareto optimality still remains unclear and has not been investigated adequately in prior literature. We attempt to fill this gap by dividing the AEP process into a pre-stage observation process and a two-stage regulatory scheme as motivated by recent real-world examples. We apply the characterizations of each stage’s state variables to build a conceptual AEP model based on the classical theory of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Considering different real-world scenarios, we extend this conceptual AEP model into three different AEP models: non-limited, uniform-limited, and heterogeneous-limited AEP models. The allocation schemes derived from each of these three models are proved theoretically to be systemic Pareto optimal in the corresponding scenarios. The advantages of our models over other AEP methods are real-world tractability, enforceability, and systemic Pareto optimality. We further conduct an empirical analysis on allocating SO2 emission permits among mainland China’s major million-KW coal-fired power plants using the proposed models. Results of our empirical study show that the heterogeneous-limited AEP model exhibits higher performance over the non-limited and uniform-limited AEP models. Thus, we suggest that the Chinese coal-fired power industry should employ the heterogeneous-limited AEP model in the practical allocation of SO2 emission permits.

[1]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises , 2015 .

[2]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Linking Tradable Permit Systems: A Key Element of Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture , 2009 .

[3]  P. Zhou,et al.  On estimating shadow prices of undesirable outputs with efficiency models: A literature review , 2014, Applied Energy.

[4]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  Eco-design of transportation in sustainable supply chain management: A DEA-like method , 2016 .

[5]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China's manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model , 2016 .

[6]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector , 2006 .

[7]  Guo Li,et al.  Impact of emission regulation policies on Chinese power firms’ reusable environmental investments and sustainable operations , 2017 .

[8]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Responsibility accounting in carbon allocation : A global perspective , 2014 .

[9]  Ray Y. Zhong,et al.  Allocation of emission permits using DEA-game-theoretic model , 2017, Oper. Res..

[10]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Measuring China’s regional energy and carbon emission efficiency with DEA models: A survey , 2016 .

[11]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Revealing Energy Over-Consumption and Pollutant Over-Emission Behind GDP: A New Multi-criteria Sustainable Measure , 2019 .

[12]  Lei Zhu,et al.  How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? , 2014 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Output-based allocation of emissions permits for mitigating the leakage and competitiveness issues for the Japanese economy , 2014 .

[15]  T. Tietenberg The Tradable-Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change , 2003 .

[16]  Ming-Jia Li,et al.  Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry , 2017 .

[17]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  The CO2 emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China's industry: evidence from the regional level , 2016 .

[18]  Nathaniel O. Keohane,et al.  Cap and Trade, Rehabilitated: Using Tradable Permits to Control U.S. Greenhouse Gases , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[19]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Overconfident Competing Newsvendors , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO2 emission reduction quota trading in China , 2013 .

[21]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  M. Song,et al.  Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system , 2016 .

[23]  Axel Pierru,et al.  Modelling and allocation of CO2 emissions in a multiproduct industry: The case of oil refining , 2007 .

[24]  Till Requate,et al.  Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology:: Will the true ranking please stand up? , 2003 .

[25]  Hana Nielsen,et al.  Productive efficiency in the iron and steel sector under state planning: The case of China and former Czechoslovakia in a comparative perspective , 2017 .

[26]  Y. Geng,et al.  Achieving China’s INDC through carbon cap-and-trade: Insights from Shanghai , 2016 .

[27]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[28]  Lars Zetterberg,et al.  A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances , 2007 .

[29]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Exploring the impacts of the EU ETS emission limits on airline performance via the Dynamic Environmental DEA approach , 2016 .

[30]  Makoto Tanaka,et al.  Market power in emissions trading: Strategically manipulating permit price through fringe firms , 2012 .

[31]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions , 2007, Land Economics.

[32]  Jiang Wu,et al.  Identification of key energy efficiency drivers through global city benchmarking: A data driven approach , 2017 .

[33]  Daniel C. Matisoff,et al.  Understanding drivers of energy efficiency changes in China , 2016 .

[34]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[35]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances , 2005 .

[36]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Measuring energy economic efficiency: A mathematical programming approach , 2016 .

[37]  Malin Song,et al.  Comprehensive efficiency evaluation of coal enterprises from production and pollution treatment process , 2015 .

[38]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Regional total factor energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of industrial sector in China , 2012 .

[39]  S. Borenstein On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Operating Licenses , 1988 .

[40]  Yu Hao,et al.  Is China’s carbon reduction target allocation reasonable? An analysis based on carbon intensity convergence , 2015 .

[41]  Jiasen Sun,et al.  Allocation of emission permits in large data sets: a robust multi-criteria approach , 2017 .

[42]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook , 2016 .

[43]  Dalia Streimikiene,et al.  Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: Driving forces and possibilities for reduction , 2016 .

[44]  Nick Hanley,et al.  The optimal initial allocation of pollution permits: a relative performance approach , 2008 .

[45]  Shoude Li,et al.  Emission permit banking, pollution abatement and production–inventory control of the firm , 2013 .

[46]  Ji-Won Park,et al.  Permit Allocation in Emissions Trading using the Boltzmann Distribution , 2012 .

[47]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  Revenue-Raising versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Preexisting Tax Distortions , 1997 .

[48]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Assessment of large commercial rooftop photovoltaic system installations: Evidence from California , 2017 .

[49]  Xuanming Su Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models , 2007 .

[50]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism , 2013 .

[51]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Transactions Costs in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs , 2003 .

[52]  P. Zhou,et al.  Output-specific energy efficiency assessment: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2016 .

[53]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading , 1998 .

[54]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Industrial energy conservation and emission reduction performance in China: A city-level nonparametric analysis , 2016 .

[55]  Malin Song,et al.  Environmental efficiency and economic growth of China: A Ray slack-based model analysis , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Liang Liang,et al.  A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[57]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Air emissions perspective on energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China's coastal areas , 2017 .

[58]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Long-Run Equilibrium Modeling of Emissions Allowance Allocation Systems in Electric Power Markets , 2010, Oper. Res..

[59]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Carbon neutral growth from 2020 strategy and airline environmental inefficiency: A Network Range Adjusted Environmental Data Envelopment Analysis , 2017 .

[60]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Measurement and decomposition of energy-saving and emissions reduction performance in Chinese cities , 2015 .

[61]  E. Haites,et al.  Output-based allocation as a form of protection for internationally competitive industries , 2003 .

[62]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Benchmarks as a tool for free allocation through comparison with similar projects: Focused on multi-family housing complex , 2014 .

[63]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect , 2010 .