Toward a Perceptually Based Metric for BRDF Modeling

Measured materials are used in computer graphics to enhance the realism of synthetic images. They are often approximated with analytical models to improve storage efficiency and allow for importance sampling. However, the error metrics used in the optimization procedure do not have a perceptual basis and the obtained results do not always correspond to the best visual match. In this paper we present a first steps towards creating a perceptually-based metric for BRDF modeling. First, a set of measured materials were approximated with different error metrics and analytical BRDF models. Next, a psychophysical study was performed to compare the visual fidelity obtained using different error metrics and models. The results of this study show that the cube root metric leads to a better perceptual approximation than other RMS based metrics, independently of the analytical BRDF model used. More benefit of using the cube root metric compared to the RMS based metrics is obtained for sharp specular lobes, and as the specular lobe broadens the benefit of using the cube root metric decreases. The use of the cube root error metric will improve the visual fidelity of renderings made using BRDF approximations and expand the usage of measured materials in computer graphics.

[1]  Greg Humphreys,et al.  Physically Based Rendering, Second Edition: From Theory To Implementation , 2010 .

[2]  James A. Ferwerda,et al.  Effects of Image Dynamic Range on Apparent Surface Gloss , 2009, CIC.

[3]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Image-driven navigation of analytical BRDF models , 2006, EGSR '06.

[5]  E. Reinhard Photographic Tone Reproduction for Digital Images , 2002 .

[6]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  A Reflectance Model for Computer Graphics , 1987, TOGS.

[7]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  High dynamic range imaging pipeline: perception-motivated representation of visual content , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  Printing spatially-varying reflectance , 2009, SIGGRAPH 2009.

[9]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Experimental analysis of BRDF models , 2005, EGSR '05.

[10]  Ethan D. Montag,et al.  Empirical formula for creating error bars for the method of paired comparison , 2006, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Roy S. Berns,et al.  Real-Time Multispectral Rendering with Complex Illumination , 2011, Color Imaging Conference.

[12]  Philip Dutré,et al.  The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  M. Ashikhmin,et al.  Distribution-based BRDFs , 2007 .

[15]  Christophe Schlick,et al.  An Inexpensive BRDF Model for Physically‐based Rendering , 1994, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  Roland W Fleming,et al.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[17]  Peter Shirley,et al.  An Anisotropic Phong BRDF Model , 2000, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[18]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  A data-driven reflectance model , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Sang Wook Lee,et al.  Global optimization for estimating a multiple-lobe analytical BRDF , 2011, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..