Driving on familiar roads: Automaticity and inattention blindness

Abstract This paper describes our research into the processes that govern driver attention and behavior in familiar, well-practiced situations. The experiment examined the effects of extended practice on inattention blindness and detection of changes to the driving environment in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Participants were paid to drive a simulated road regularly over 3 months of testing. A range of measures, including detection task performance and driving performance, were collected over the course of 20 sessions. Performance from a yoked Control Group who experienced the same road scenarios in a single session was also measured. The data showed changes in what drivers reported noticing indicative of inattention blindness, and declining ratings of mental demand suggesting that many participants were “driving without awareness”. Extended practice also resulted in increased sensitivity for detecting changes to road features associated with vehicle guidance and improved performance on an embedded vehicle detection task (detection of a specific vehicle type). The data provide new light on a “tandem model” of driver behavior that includes both explicit and implicit processes involved in driving performance. The findings also suggest reasons drivers are most likely to crash at locations very near their homes.

[1]  Samuel G Charlton Perceptual and attentional effects on drivers' speed selection at curves. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[3]  F K Winston,et al.  Trip characteristics of vehicle crashes involving child passengers , 2005, Injury Prevention.

[4]  George Humphrey The story of man's mind , 1924 .

[5]  Nicola J. Starkey,et al.  Driving without awareness: The effects of practice and automaticity on attention and driving , 2011 .

[6]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Automatization, automation, and modeling of driver's behavior , 2000 .

[7]  B L Cole,et al.  What attracts attention when driving? , 1986, Ergonomics.

[8]  K. Connolly,et al.  Psychologically Speaking: A Book of Quotations , 1991 .

[9]  W. N. Schoenfeld,et al.  Principles of Psychology , 2007 .

[10]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[11]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[13]  Peter Chapman,et al.  WAKING UP AT THE WHEEL: ACCIDENTS, ATTENTION AND THE TIME-GAP EXPERIENCE , 1999 .

[14]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D. G. MacKay The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[16]  Marieke Hendrikje Martens,et al.  Do Familiarity and Expectations Change Perception? Drivers' Glances and Response to Changes , 2007 .

[17]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  Conspicuity, memorability, comprehension, and priming in road hazard warning signs. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[19]  J. Gibson,et al.  A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving , 1938 .

[20]  I. D. Brown,et al.  Driver fatigue : Fatigue , 1994 .

[21]  David Shinar,et al.  Sign location, sign recognition, and driver expectancies , 2008 .

[22]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Jon E. Roeckelein,et al.  Elsevier's Dictionary of Psychological Theories , 2006 .