Tonic-clonic seizure detection using accelerometry-based wearable sensors: A prospective, video-EEG controlled study

PURPOSE The aim of this prospective, video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) controlled study was to evaluate the performance of an accelerometry-based wearable system to detect tonic-clonic seizures (TCSs) and to investigate the accuracy of different seizure detection algorithms using separate training and test data sets. METHODS Seventy-five epilepsy surgery candidates undergoing video-EEG monitoring were included. The patients wore one three-axis accelerometer on each wrist during video-EEG. The accelerometer data was band-pass filtered and reduced using a movement threshold and mapped to a time-frequency feature space representation. Algorithms based on standard binary classifiers combined with a TCS specific event detection layer were developed and trained using the training set. Their performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and false positive (FP) rate using the test set. RESULTS Thirty-seven available TCSs in 11 patients were recorded and the data was divided into disjoint training (27 TCSs, three patients) and test (10 TCSs, eight patients) data sets. The classification algorithms evaluated were K-nearest-neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF) and a linear kernel support vector machine (SVM). For the TCSs detection performance of the three algorithms in the test set, the highest sensitivity was obtained for KNN (100% sensitivity, 0.05 FP/h) and the lowest FP rate was obtained for RF (90% sensitivity, 0.01 FP/h). CONCLUSIONS The low FP rate enhances the clinical utility of the detection system for long-term reliable seizure monitoring. It also allows a possible implementation of an automated TCS detection in free-living environment, which could contribute to ascertain seizure frequency and thereby better seizure management.

[1]  A. Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Views of patients with epilepsy on seizure prediction devices , 2010, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[2]  K. Malmgren,et al.  Wearables in epilepsy and Parkinson's disease—A focus group study , 2018, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Christian E Elger,et al.  Diagnostic challenges in epilepsy: seizure under-reporting and seizure detection , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Convulsive seizure detection using a wrist‐worn electrodermal activity and accelerometry biosensor , 2012, Epilepsia.

[5]  Deborah Buck,et al.  Quality of Life of People with Epilepsy: A European Study , 1997, Epilepsia.

[6]  Dongni Johansson,et al.  Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review , 2018, Journal of Neurology.

[7]  Sándor Beniczky,et al.  Automated real-time detection of tonic-clonic seizures using a wearable EMG device , 2018, Neurology.

[8]  Isa Conradsen,et al.  Seizure onset detection based on a Uni- or Multi-modal Intelligent Seizure Acquisition (UISA/MISA) system , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  J. Wheless,et al.  SmartWatch by SmartMonitor: Assessment of Seizure Detection Efficacy for Various Seizure Types in Children, a Large Prospective Single-Center Study. , 2015, Pediatric neurology.

[10]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  Automated detection of tonic seizures using 3-D accelerometry , 2009 .

[11]  H. Lüders,et al.  Semiological Seizure Classification * , 1998, Epilepsia.

[12]  J. Britton,et al.  Patient and caregiver view on seizure detection devices: A survey study , 2016, Seizure.

[13]  Robert S. Fisher,et al.  Detection of seizure-like movements using a wrist accelerometer , 2011, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[14]  Jane Hanna,et al.  Safe and sound? A systematic literature review of seizure detection methods for personal use , 2016, Seizure.

[15]  Sándor Beniczky,et al.  Detection of generalized tonic–clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer: A prospective, multicenter study , 2013, Epilepsia.

[16]  W. Bamlet,et al.  Injuries due to seizures in persons with epilepsy , 2004, Neurology.

[17]  S. Le,et al.  Tracking generalized tonic-clonic seizures with a wrist accelerometer linked to an online database , 2016, Seizure.

[18]  F. Leijten,et al.  Multimodal seizure detection: A review , 2018, Epilepsia.

[19]  Madeleine Czarnecki,et al.  Machine learning for detection of epileptic seizures , 2015 .

[20]  Johannes Van Dijk,et al.  Multimodal, automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures at home: Is a reliable seizure detector feasible? , 2017, Epilepsia open.

[21]  C. Kessler,et al.  Clinical predictors of the long‐term social outcome and quality of life in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: 20–65 years of follow‐up , 2014, Epilepsia.

[22]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Multicenter clinical assessment of improved wearable multimodal convulsive seizure detectors , 2017, Epilepsia.

[23]  A. V. D. Vel,et al.  Critical evaluation of four different seizure detection systems tested on one patient with focal and generalized tonic and clonic seizures , 2014, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[24]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Accelerometry-Based Home Monitoring for Detection of Nocturnal Hypermotor Seizures Based on Novelty Detection , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[25]  M. Nei,et al.  Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy , 2010, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[26]  Robert S Fisher,et al.  The New Classification of Seizures by the International League Against Epilepsy 2017 , 2017, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[27]  Anup D. Patel,et al.  Patient-centered design criteria for wearable seizure detection devices , 2016, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[28]  Wim Van Paesschen,et al.  Comparison between Scalp EEG and Behind-the-Ear EEG for Development of a Wearable Seizure Detection System for Patients with Focal Epilepsy , 2017, Sensors.