Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences

A class of four simultaneous component models for the exploratory analysis of multivariate time series collected from more than one subject simultaneously is discussed. In each of the models, the multivariate time series of each subject is decomposed into a few series of component scores and a loading matrix. The component scores series reveal the latent data structure in the course of time. The interpretation of the components is based on the loading matrix. The simultaneous component models model not only intraindividual variability, but interindividual variability as well. The four models can be ordered hierarchically from weakly to severely constrained, thus allowing for big to small interindividual differences in the model. The use of the models is illustrated by an empirical example.

[1]  L. Tucker.  A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[2]  H. Kaiser.  The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[3]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series , 1963 .

[4]  N. Cliff.  Orthogonal rotation to congruence , 1966 .

[5]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[6]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Determination and Proof of Minimum Uniqueness Conditions for PARAFAC1 , 1972 .

[7]  R. Engle,et al.  A One-Factor Multivariate Time Series Model of Metropolitan Wage Rates , 1981 .

[8]  R. A. Harshman,et al.  Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model , 1984 .

[9]  H. Law.  Research methods for multimode data analysis , 1984 .

[10]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series , 1985 .

[11]  D. Watson.  Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[14]  C.C.J.H. Bijleveld.  Exploratory linear dynamic systems analysis , 1989 .

[15]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[16]  Optimal Scaling of Time Series. , 1992 .

[17]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure , 1994 .

[18]  J R Nesselroade,et al.  Structure and variation of mood in individuals with Parkinson's disease: a dynamic factor analysis. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Jan Niesing.  Simultaneous componenet and factor analysis methods for two or more groups: a comparative study. , 1997 .

[20]  Claus A. Andersson,et al.  PARAFAC2—Part II. Modeling chromatographic data with retention time shifts , 1999 .

[21]  H. Kiers,et al.  Cross‐validation of multiway component models , 1999 .

[22]  R. Bro,et al.  PARAFAC2—Part I. A direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC2 model , 1999 .

[23]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Component analysis of multisubject multivariate longitudinal data , 2001 .

[24]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Three-way component analysis with smoothness constraints , 2002 .

[25]  R. Bro,et al.  Centering and scaling in component analysis , 2003 .