Modelling Emergence of Wolbachia Toxin-Antidote Protein Functions with an Evolutionary Algorithm

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) simulate Darwinian evolution and adeptly mimic natural evolution. Most EA applications in biology encode high levels of abstraction in top-down ecological population models. In contrast, our research merges protein alignment algorithms from bioinformatics into codon based EAs that simulate molecular protein string evolution from the bottom up. We apply our EA to reconcile a problem in the field of Wolbachia induced cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). Wolbachia is a microbial endosymbiont that lives inside insect cells. CI is conditional insect sterility that operates as a toxin antidote (TA) system. Although, CI exhibits complex phenotypes not fully explained under a single discrete model. We instantiate in-silico genes that control CI, CI factors (cifs), as strings within the EA chromosome. We monitor the evolution of their enzymatic activity, binding, and cellular localization by applying selective pressure on their primary amino acid strings. Our model helps rationalize why two distinct mechanisms of CI induction might coexist in nature. We find that nuclear localization signals (NLS) and Type IV secretion system signals (T4SS) are of low complexity and evolve fast, whereas binding interactions have intermediate complexity, and enzymatic activity is the most complex. Our model predicts that as ancestral TA systems evolve into eukaryotic CI systems, the placement of NLS or T4SS signals can stochastically vary, imparting effects that might impact CI induction mechanics. Our model highlights how preconditions, genetic diversity, and sequence length can bias evolution of cifs towards one mechanism or another.

[1]  B. Loppin,et al.  Paternal transmission of the Wolbachia CidB toxin underlies cytoplasmic incompatibility , 2022, Current Biology.

[2]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  The CinB Nuclease from wNo Wolbachia Is Sufficient for Induction of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Drosophila , 2022, mBio.

[3]  S. Ritchie,et al.  A decade of stability for wMel Wolbachia in natural Aedes aegypti populations , 2021, bioRxiv.

[4]  B. S. Cooper,et al.  A single mutation weakens symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation through reductions in deubiquitylation efficiency , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Candan Tamerler,et al.  Combining genetic algorithm with machine learning strategies for designing potent antimicrobial peptides , 2021, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  F. Catteruccia,et al.  Wolbachia cifB induces cytoplasmic incompatibility in the malaria mosquito vector , 2021, Nature Microbiology.

[7]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Modeling CRISPR gene drives for suppression of invasive rodents using a supervised machine learning framework , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  J. Welch,et al.  Life and Death of Selfish Genes: Comparative Genomics Reveals the Dynamic Evolution of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility , 2020, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  A. Azad,et al.  Evolution of Wolbachia mutualism and reproductive parasitism: insight from two novel strains that co-infect cat fleas , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  The Wolbachia cytoplasmic incompatibility enzyme CidB targets nuclear import and protamine-histone exchange factors , 2019, eLife.

[11]  B. Caputo,et al.  Variation in Wolbachia cidB gene, but not cidA, is associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility mod phenotype diversity in Culex pipiens , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[12]  Bo Zheng,et al.  Incompatible and sterile insect techniques combined eliminate mosquitoes , 2019, Nature.

[13]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  Two-By-One model of cytoplasmic incompatibility: Synthetic recapitulation by transgenic expression of cifA and cifB in Drosophila , 2019, PLoS genetics.

[14]  A. Duplouy,et al.  Models and Nomenclature for Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: Caution over Premature Conclusions - A Response to Beckmann et al. , 2019, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  D. Poinsot,et al.  Caution Does Not Preclude Predictive and Testable Models of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: A Reply to Shropshire et al. , 2019, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  D. Poinsot,et al.  The Toxin-Antidote Model of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: Genetics and Evolutionary Implications. , 2019, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  P. Mackiewicz,et al.  The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm , 2018, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[18]  M. Turelli,et al.  Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana , 2018, bioRxiv.

[19]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright–Fisher Model , 2018, bioRxiv.

[20]  A. Azad,et al.  A Tangled Web: Origins of Reproductive Parasitism , 2018, Genome biology and evolution.

[21]  Andrew G. Clark,et al.  Reducing resistance allele formation in CRISPR gene drive , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Using Evolutionary Algorithms and Machine Learning to Explore Sequence Space for the Discovery of Antimicrobial Peptides , 2018 .

[24]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  A Wolbachia Deubiquitylating Enzyme Induces Cytoplasmic Incompatibility , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[25]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  Prophage WO Genes Recapitulate and Enhance Wolbachia-induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility , 2017, Nature.

[26]  Christoph Adami,et al.  From Entropy to Information: Biased Typewriters and the Origin of Life , 2015, ArXiv.

[27]  A. F. van den Hurk,et al.  Wolbachia Reduces the Transmission Potential of Dengue-Infected Aedes aegypti , 2015, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[28]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  SLiM: Simulating Evolution with Selection and Linkage , 2013, Genetics.

[29]  Sam P. Brown,et al.  The coevolution of toxin and antitoxin genes drives the dynamics of bacterial addiction complexes and intragenomic conflict , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  M. Inouye,et al.  Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea. , 2011, Annual review of genetics.

[31]  Zhao-Qing Luo,et al.  The E Block motif is associated with Legionella pneumophila translocated substrates , 2010, Cellular microbiology.

[32]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The Bacterial Symbiont Wolbachia Induces Resistance to RNA Viral Infections in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, PLoS biology.

[33]  J. Werren,et al.  Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[34]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  A linguistic model for the rational design of antimicrobial peptides , 2006, Nature.

[35]  Zhiyong Xi,et al.  Wolbachia Establishment and Invasion in an Aedes aegypti Laboratory Population , 2005, Science.

[36]  Christoph Dehio,et al.  A bipartite signal mediates the transfer of type IV secretion substrates of Bartonella henselae into human cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Hiroki Nagai,et al.  A C-terminal translocation signal required for Dot/Icm-dependent delivery of the Legionella RalF protein to host cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Vergunst,et al.  Positive charge is an important feature of the C-terminal transport signal of the VirB/D4-translocated proteins of Agrobacterium. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Z. Ding,et al.  VirE2, a Type IV secretion substrate, interacts with the VirD4 transfer protein at cell poles of Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[41]  D. Poinsot,et al.  On the mechanism of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility: confronting the models with the facts. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[42]  D. Poinsot,et al.  ⃛and discovered on Mount Kilimanjaro , 1998, Nature.

[43]  R. Lewontin ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[44]  A. R. Barr,et al.  The etiological agent of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens. , 1973, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[45]  A. R. Barr,et al.  New Hypothesis of the Cause of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. , 1971, Nature.

[46]  M. Laird,et al.  Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through Cytoplasmic Incompatibility , 1967, Nature.

[47]  M. Hertig The Rickettsia, Wolbachia pipientis (gen. et sp.n.) and Associated Inclusions of the Mosquito, Culex pipiens , 1936, Parasitology.

[48]  M Hertig,et al.  Studies on Rickettsia-Like Micro-Organisms in Insects. , 1924, The Journal of medical research.

[49]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  SLiM 2: Flexible, Interactive Forward Genetic Simulations , 2017, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  B. Hohn,et al.  The VirD2 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens carries nuclear localization signals important for transfer of T-DNA to plant. , 1993, Molecular & general genetics : MGG.

[51]  H. Laven [Reciprocally differentiable crossing of mosquitoes (Culicidae) and its significance for plasmatic heredity]. , 1953, Zeitschrift fur induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.