Cross-Modality Vertebrae Localization and Labeling Using Learning-Based Approaches

Spine is one of the major organs in human body. It consists of multiple vertebrae and inter-vertebral discs. As the locations and labels of vertebrae provide a vertical reference framework to different organs in the torso, they play an important role in various neurological, orthopaedic and oncological studies. On the other hand, however, manual localization and labeling of vertebrae is often time consuming. Therefore, automatic vertebrae localization and labeling has drawn significant attentions in the community of medical image analysis. While some pioneer studies aim to localize and label vertebrae using domain knowledge, more recent studies tackle this problem via machine learning technologies. With the spirit of “data-driven”, learning-based approaches are able to extract the appearance and geometric characteristics of vertebrae more efficient and effective than hand-crafted algorithms. More importantly, it facilitates cross-modality vertebrae localization, i.e., a generic algorithm working on different imaging modalities. In this chapter, we start with a review of several representative learning-based vertebrae localization and labeling methods. The key ideas of these methods are re-visited. In order to achieve a solution that is robust to severe diseases (e.g., scoliosis) and imaging artifacts (e.g., metal artifacts), we propose a learning-based method with two novel components. First, instead of treating vertebrae/discs as either repetitive components or completely independent entities, we emulate a radiologist and use a hierarchial strategy to learn detectors dedicated to anchor (distinctive) vertebrae, bundle (non-distinctive) vertebrae and inter-vertebral discs, respectively. At run-time, anchor vertebrae are detected concurrently to provide redundant and distributed appearance cues robust to local imaging artifacts. Bundle vertebrae detectors provide candidates of vertebrae with subtle appearance differences, whose labels are mutually determined by anchor vertebrae to gain additional robustness. Disc locations are derived from a cloud of responses from disc detectors, which is robust to sporadic voxel-level errors. Second, owing to the non-rigidness of spine anatomies, we employ a local articulated model to effectively model the spatial relations across vertebrae and discs. The local articulated model fuses appearance cues from different detectors in a way that is robust to abnormal spine geometry caused by severe diseases. Our method is validated on a large scale of CT (189) and MR (300) spine scans. It exhibits robust performance, especially to cases with severe diseases and imaging artifacts.

[1]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Image segmentation using MRI vertebral cross-sections , 2001, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555).

[2]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Yalin Zheng,et al.  Automatic lumbar vertebrae segmentation in fluoroscopic images via optimised concurrent Hough transform , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Automated spinal column extraction and partitioning , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[5]  Tao Wu,et al.  Automated Identification of Thoracolumbar Vertebrae Using Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2011, MLMI.

[6]  Florian Schulze,et al.  Automated landmarking and labeling of fully and partially scanned spinal columns in CT images , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  P. Bifulco,et al.  Automatic recognition of vertebral landmarks in fluoroscopic sequences for analysis of intervertebral kinematics , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Towards robust and effective shape modeling: Sparse shape composition , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Machine Learning in Medical Imaging , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Automatic Localization and Identification of Vertebrae in Arbitrary Field-of-View CT Scans , 2012, MICCAI.

[11]  Michael P. Chwialkowski,et al.  Automated detection and evaluation of lumbar discs in MR images , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[12]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[14]  Jun Ma,et al.  Hierarchical Segmentation and Identification of Thoracic Vertebra Using Learning-Based Edge Detection and Coarse-to-Fine Deformable Model , 2010, MICCAI.

[15]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Vertebrae Localization in Pathological Spine CT via Dense Classification from Sparse Annotations , 2013, MICCAI.

[16]  Zhigang Peng,et al.  Automated Vertebra Detection and Segmentation from the Whole Spine MR Images , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[17]  Jacques A. de Guise,et al.  Wavelet-based automatic segmentation of the vertebral bodies in digital radiographs , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Automatic inference of articulated spine models in CT images using high-order Markov Random Fields , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Shang-Hong Lai,et al.  Learning-Based Vertebra Detection and Iterative Normalized-Cut Segmentation for Spinal MRI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic measurement of vertebral shape using active shape models , 1997, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Detection of 3D Spinal Geometry Using Iterated Marginal Space Learning , 2010, MCV.

[23]  Franklin C. Crow,et al.  Summed-area tables for texture mapping , 1984, SIGGRAPH.

[24]  Sebastian P. M. Dries,et al.  Spine Detection and Labeling Using a Parts-Based Graphical Model , 2007, IPMI.

[25]  Yiqiang Zhan,et al.  Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy: the three keys to highly robust anatomical parsing in medical images , 2010, MIR '10.

[26]  José M. Iñesta,et al.  On the possibility of objective identification of human vertebrae through pattern recognition algorithms , 1995 .

[27]  Jason J. Corso,et al.  Labeling of Lumbar Discs Using Both Pixel- and Object-Level Features With a Two-Level Probabilistic Model , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Geometric Variability of the Scoliotic Spine Using Statistics on Articulated Shape Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[30]  Benoît Naegel Using mathematical morphology for the anatomical labeling of vertebrae from 3D CT-scan images , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..