Abstract This paper reviews a range of initiatives that attempt to transform the global institutional arrangements through which production and trade of coffee is organised and governed. Specifically, it examines the Fair Trade system, Starbucks' CAFÉ Practices Program, and a range of wider campaigning activities around issues of ‘trade justice’. These initiatives are shown to have contributed to the empowerment of marginalised workers and producers in the global coffee industry, to the extent that they have complied with the following three conditions: promoting the acceptance of expanded responsibility for tackling disempowerment among relevant decision makers in the global North; strengthening institutional capabilities necessary for these responsibilities to be effectively discharged; and enabling marginalised groups themselves to exercise some control over processes of institutional transformation. However, these initiatives have typically been designed as discrete systems of ‘supply chain’ governance, which has limited their ability to advance those dimensions of worker and producer well-being that are shaped by a range of state and non-state actors beyond as well as within supply chain institutions. In theory this limitation could be overcome via appropriate allocation and co-ordination of partial and shared responsibilities across a plurality of relevant decision makers. In practice, however, the failure of these initiatives to develop either transparent means of defining the boundaries of partial responsibilities, or institutional modalities to enable their co-ordination, has significantly weakened their capacity to entrench empowerment principles throughout the governance system of the coffee industry as a whole. It is concluded that the development of such conceptual and institutional models will be necessary to enable both consistency and enforceability of empowerment outcomes, and thereby to ensure that principles of justice can be realised among workers and producers throughout the global coffee industry.
[1]
S. Ponte.
The 'Latte Revolution'? Winners and Losers in the Re- structuring of the Global Coffee Marketing Chain
,
2001
.
[2]
M. Finnemore,et al.
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
,
1998,
International Organization.
[3]
D. Narayan,et al.
Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook
,
2002
.
[4]
R. Goodin.
Apportioning responsibilities
,
1987
.
[5]
C. Dolan.
Fields of Obligation
,
2005
.
[6]
April Linton,et al.
A taste of trade justice: marketing global social responsibility via Fair Trade coffee
,
2004
.
[7]
Andrew Kuper.
Global Responsibilities : Who Must Deliver on Human Rights?
,
2005
.
[8]
PETER LEIGH TAYLOR,et al.
In the Market But Not of It: Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewardship Council Certification as Market-Based Social Change
,
2005
.
[9]
Karla Utting-chamorro.
Does fair trade make a difference? The case of small coffee producers in Nicaragua
,
2005
.
[10]
David Held.
Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance
,
1995
.
[11]
S. Scheffler.
Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought
,
2001
.
[12]
J. Bastiaensen,et al.
Fair trade and the coffee crisis in the Nicaraguan Segovias
,
2003
.
[13]
C. Bacon,et al.
Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?
,
2004
.
[14]
Charlotte Opal,et al.
Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption
,
2005
.
[15]
L. Becchetti,et al.
Fair Trade: A 'Third Generation' Welfare Mechanism to Make Globalisation Sustainable
,
2004
.
[16]
J. Jonakin.
The impact of structural adjustment and property rights conflicts on Nicaraguan Agrarian reform beneficiaries
,
1996
.