Information Visualization, Web 2.0, and the Teaching of Writing

Abstract With the development of free, online, interactive visualization tools, the field of information visualization—or infovis—is being opened to diverse users and uses, and particularly to novice users who want to visualize personally relevant information. Indeed, Web 2.0 is making infovis increasingly viable as a medium for organizing, exploring, analyzing, and creatively deriving meaning from the deluge of information that we face in our everyday lives. For writing teachers, new developments in information visualization bring valuable opportunities to enhance our students’ digital and critical competencies. Projects that ask students to visualize text, personal data, and social data can provide compelling entry points into Web 2.0, as students learn about existing tools and sources of data, create their own visualizations, and then analyze the insight that they and others can gain through seeing data represented visually. Incorporating infovis assignments into writing classes can help us reinvigorate some of our standard assignments, encourage students to think critically about the software they use, and provide new opportunities for the production of digital artifacts.

[1]  Denis Lalanne,et al.  Human Machine Interaction, Research Results of the MMI Program , 2009, Human Machine Interaction.

[2]  Chris M. Anson,et al.  Teaching Writing Using Blogs, Wikis, and other Digital Tools , 2008 .

[3]  Stephanie Vie.  Digital Divide 2.0: “Generation M” and Online Social Networking Sites in the Composition Classroom , 2008 .

[4]  Barbara Mirel,et al.  Visualizations for Data Exploration and Analysis: A Critical Review of Usability Research , 1998 .

[5]  Rebecca Wilson Lundin,et al.  Teaching with Wikis: Toward a Networked Pedagogy , 2008 .

[6]  Michael Danziger,et al.  Information visualization for the people , 2008 .

[7]  J. M. Cerezo,et al.  Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[8]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Towards a Model of Information Aesthetics in Information Visualization , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[9]  Geoffrey Rockwell,et al.  What is Text Analysis, Really? , 2003, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[10]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Carlos Salinas.  Technical Rhetoricians and the Art of Configuring Images , 2002 .

[12]  Stuart A. Selber,et al.  Multiliteracies for a Digital Age , 2004 .

[13]  Søren Mørk Petersen.  Loser Generated Content: From Participation to Exploitation , 2008, First Monday.

[14]  Jennifer Sheppard,et al.  The Rhetorical Work of Multimedia Production Practices: It's More than Just Technical Skill , 2009 .

[15]  C. Kostelnick.  The Visual Rhetoric of Data Displays: The Conundrum of Clarity , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[16]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[17]  S. Michaels,et al.  A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .

[18]  Daniel Anderson,et al.  The Low Bridge to High Benefits: Entry-Level Multimedia, Literacies, and Motivation , 2008 .

[19]  Diana George,et al.  From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing , 2002 .

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .