The potential and economics of bioenergy in Finland

Abstract This article summarises the results from four studies on the potential of bioenergy, and one study on the economic feasibility of distributed renewable energy production, in Ostrobothnia, Finland. The scope of the studies was to explore the degree of energy self-sufficiency that could be achieved, and the economic implications and benefits. The results suggest that a great majority of rural areas have the potential for being self-sufficient in their energy production through bioenergy alone, but other renewable energy sources (RES), including for example wind and solar power, will make an even greater contribution in the future. This applies to areas especially outside the largest population centres and most energy intensive industries. Indeed, in peripheral regions the renewable energy potential far exceeds the energy demand, and the spatial coverage of energy self-sufficiency is huge. Other European and global studies also show tremendous RES potential. The economics of small scale power generation units, here represented by biogas plants, are already feasible, despite the technology still being at an early developmental phase. Diffusion of these technologies depends on a number of factors, but single and separate units are emerging all the time. The adoption of RES based energy management systems will however be a long social process. The results give rise to an expectation for more RES based energy generation in Ostrobothnia and Finland and even in Europe and globally. In a time frame of 20–30 years, this development may result in structural changes across the whole energy sector. This comprehensive movement can only be understood and supported by multi- and cross-scientific approaches, and it will in future be a challenge for forthcoming research.

[1]  Nenad Debrecin,et al.  Potential and use of renewable energy sources in Croatia , 2006 .

[2]  J. Cooper Opportunities and Technical Strategies for Silicon Carbide Device Development , 2002 .

[3]  André Faaij,et al.  Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050 , 2007 .

[4]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  How Many People Can the Earth Support , 1996 .

[5]  Kaija Hakala,et al.  Field biomass as global energy source , 2009 .

[6]  M. Redclift,et al.  Social Theory and the Global Environment , 1994 .

[7]  Svetlana Ladanai,et al.  Global potential of sustainable biomass for energy , 2009 .

[8]  V. Dovi',et al.  Cleaner energy for sustainable future , 2009 .

[9]  Rachel Schurman,et al.  Closing the “Great Divide”: New Social Theory on Society and Nature , 2000 .

[10]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Economic use of renewable resources, LCA, cleaner batch processes and minimising emissions and wastewater , 2008 .

[11]  P. Bosch,et al.  Climate change 2007 - mitigation of climate change , 2007 .

[12]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  A methodology for validating the renewable energy data in EU , 2007 .

[13]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[14]  D. Stanners,et al.  Europe's environment : the Dobrís assessment , 1995 .

[15]  André Faaij,et al.  The potential biomass for energy production in the Czech Republic , 2006 .

[16]  T. Ranta,et al.  Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production - a GIS-based availability and supply cost analysis , 2002 .

[17]  J. Lubchenco Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[18]  V. P. Khambalkar,et al.  Assessment of bioresources potential of a rural village for self energy generation , 2008, BioResources.

[19]  W. Catton Foundations of Human Ecology , 1994 .

[20]  Hermann Scheer,et al.  Case studies of the EU-15 states , 2005 .

[21]  Neven Duić,et al.  Mapping the potential for decentralized energy generation based on renewable energy sources in the Republic of Croatia , 2007 .

[22]  Umberto Colombo The Club of Rome and sustainable development , 2001 .

[23]  André Faaij,et al.  Biomass production potentials in Central and Eastern Europe under different scenarios , 2007 .

[24]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[25]  Fatih Evrendilek,et al.  Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources in Turkey , 2003 .

[26]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[27]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Investment criteria for the selection of cogeneration plants¿a state of the art review , 2006 .

[28]  Judith Franco,et al.  Potential renewable energy resources of the Lerma Valley, Salta, Argentina for its strategic territorial planning , 2009 .

[29]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach , 2007 .

[30]  R. Haas,et al.  Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale , 2008 .

[31]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[32]  A. Faaij,et al.  A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 , 2007 .

[33]  Limits beyond the millennium: a retro-prospective on The limits to growth , 2001 .

[34]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Development of SuperSmart Grids for a more efficient utilisation of electricity from renewable sources , 2009 .

[35]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: conceptual issues. , 2010 .

[36]  F. Buttel NEW DIRECTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY , 1987 .

[37]  Martin Kaltschmitt,et al.  The biomethane potential in Chile. , 2009 .

[38]  J. Hannigan,et al.  Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective , 1995 .

[39]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the limits: Global collapse or a sustainable future , 1993 .

[40]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  How Many People Can the Earth Support , 1998 .

[41]  M. Morroni,et al.  Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: feasible paths and policy implications , 2010 .

[42]  Peter J. Bowler,et al.  The Norton history of the environmental sciences , 1992 .

[43]  F. Buttel,et al.  Environmental sociology and global environmental change: A critical assessment , 1992 .

[44]  Richard N. Zare,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality , 1999, Science.

[45]  A. Giri The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity , 2002 .

[46]  Danyel Reiche Handbook of Renewable Energies in the European Union , 2003 .

[47]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Global bioenergy potentials through 2050 , 2001 .