Doctoral Education and Economic Development: The Flow of New Ph.D.s to Industry

Doctoral education in science and engineering is critical to the university’s role in fostering economic development. One aspect of this is the placement of recent graduates with firms. Despite the role Ph.D.s play in this process, little work has documented and analyzed these firm placements. This article takes a first step at rectifying this deficiency, using data from the 1997-1999 Survey of Earned Doctorates administered by the National Science Foundation to all doctoral recipients in the United States. The authors show that knowledge sources, as measured by the training location of new Ph.D.s going to industry, are concentrated in different geographic centers from those that university R&Dexpenditure data would suggest. The authors also find significant outflows from the Midwest of Ph.D.s and significant inflows to the Pacific and northeast regions of the country. The authors’work suggests that many states fail to capture the economic development advantages that come from training a skilled work force.

[1]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[2]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle , 1995 .

[3]  P. H. Henderson,et al.  Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Summary Report 1996. , 1995 .

[4]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[5]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[6]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[8]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[9]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940 , 1998 .

[10]  M. White,et al.  In-State Versus Out-Of State Students: The Divergence of Interest between Public Universities and State Governments , 2003 .

[11]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[12]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[13]  L. Zucker,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers , 1994 .

[14]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1999 .

[15]  Grant C. Black.  The geography of small firm innovation , 2003 .

[16]  B. Jones,et al.  Higher Education, Business Creation, and Economic Growth in the American States , 1993 .

[17]  R. Bingham,et al.  Dilemmas of urban economic development : issues in theory and practice , 1997 .

[18]  J. Quigley.  The Origins of State-Level Differences in the Public Provision of Higher Education : 1890-1940 , 2005 .

[19]  Allen R. Sanderson,et al.  Doctorate recipients from united states universities: summary report 1998 , 1998 .