Understanding Trait‐Dependent Community Disassembly: Dung Beetles, Density Functions, and Forest Fragmentation

Anthropogenic disturbances such as fragmentation are rapidly altering biodiversity, yet a lack of attention to species traits and abundance patterns has made the results of most studies difficult to generalize. We determined traits of extinction-prone species and present a novel strategy for classifying species according to their population-level response to a gradient of disturbance intensity. We examined the effects of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities in an archipelago of 33 islands recently created by flooding in Venezuela. Species richness, density, and biomass all declined sharply with decreasing island area and increasing island isolation. Species richness was highly nested, indicating that local extinctions occurred nonrandomly. The most sensitive dung beetle species appeared to require at least 85 ha of forest, more than many large vertebrates. Extinction-prone species were either large-bodied, forest specialists, or uncommon. These explanatory variables were unrelated, suggesting at least 3 underlying causes of extirpation. Large species showed high wing loading (body mass/wing area) and a distinct flight strategy that may increase their area requirements. Although forest specificity made most species sensitive to fragmentation, a few persistent habitat generalists dispersed across the matrix. Density functions classified species into 4 response groups on the basis of their change in density with decreasing species richness. Sensitive and persistent species both declined with increasing fragmentation intensity, but persistent species occurred on more islands, which may be due to their higher baseline densities. Compensatory species increased in abundance following the initial loss of sensitive species, but rapidly declined with increasing fragmentation. Supertramp species (widespread habitat generalists) may be poor competitors but strong dispersers; their abundance peaked following the decline of the other 3 groups. Nevertheless, even the least sensitive species were extirpated or rare on the smallest and most isolated islands.

[1]  T. Roslin,et al.  RAPID RECOVERY OF DUNG BEETLE COMMUNITIES FOLLOWING HABITAT FRAGMENTATION IN CENTRAL AMAZONIA , 2005 .

[2]  Philip C. Stouffer,et al.  Effects of Roads on Movements by Understory Birds in Mixed‐Species Flocks in Central Amazonian Brazil , 2001 .

[3]  B. Doube A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages , 1990 .

[4]  J. Terborgh Preservation of Natural Diversity: The Problem of Extinction Prone Species , 1974 .

[5]  F. Feer,et al.  Effects of Forest Fragmentation on a Dung Beetle Community in French Guiana , 2005 .

[6]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Terrestrial Arthropod Assemblages: Their Use in Conservation Planning , 1993 .

[7]  G. Halffter,et al.  The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) , 1966 .

[8]  K. Vulinec Iridescent Dung Beetles: a Different angle , 1997 .

[9]  E. Slade,et al.  Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[10]  E. Andresen Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration , 2003 .

[11]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.

[12]  S. Spector,et al.  Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: A quantitative literature review and meta-analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  R. Biedermann Body size and area-incidence relationships: is there a general pattern? , 2003 .

[15]  I. C. Mittal Natural Manuring and Soil Conditioning by Dung Beetles , 1993 .

[16]  A. Estrada,et al.  Tropical rain forest fragmentation, howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), and dung beetles at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico , 1999, American journal of primatology.

[17]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Stratford,et al.  Gulliver travels to the fragmented tropics: geographic variation in mechanisms of avian extinction , 2005 .

[19]  Richard S. Ostfeld,et al.  COMMUNITY DISASSEMBLY, BIODIVERSITY LOSS, AND THE EROSION OF AN ECOSYSTEM SERVICE , 2003 .

[20]  A. Forsyth,et al.  Trap Spacing and Transect Design for Dung Beetle Biodiversity Studies 1 , 2005 .

[21]  R. Didham,et al.  Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  V. Nealis,et al.  Effects of Clearing in a Tropical Rain Forest on the Composition of the Coprophagous Scarab Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera) , 1975 .

[23]  J. Barlow,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[24]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non‐random species loss , 2003 .

[25]  Bert C. Klein Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia , 1989 .

[26]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Michael J. Samways,et al.  Insects in biodiversity conservation: some perspectives and directives , 1993, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[28]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[29]  A. Forsyth,et al.  Extreme Trophic and Habitat Specialization by Peruvian Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) , 2006 .

[30]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments , 2001, Science.

[31]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[32]  C. Peres,et al.  Density compensation in neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity , 2000, Oecologia.

[33]  R. Didham,et al.  Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation , 2002 .

[34]  I. Turner Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. , 1996 .

[35]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Island theory, matrix effects and species richness patterns in habitat fragments , 2002 .

[36]  Chris Margules,et al.  Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments , 2000 .