Thermodynamic Optimization of a Geothermal- Based Organic Rankine Cycle System Using an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm

Geothermal energy is a renewable form of energy, however due to misuse, processing and management issues, it is necessary to use the resource more efficiently. To increase energy efficiency, energy systems engineers carry out careful energy control studies and offer alternative solutions. With this aim, this study was conducted to improve the performance of a real operating air-cooled organic Rankine cycle binary geothermal power plant (GPP) and its components in the aspects of thermodynamic modeling, exergy analysis and optimization processes. In-depth information is obtained about the exergy (maximum work a system can make), exergy losses and destruction at the power plant and its components. Thus the performance of the power plant may be predicted with reasonable accuracy and better understanding is gained for the physical process to be used in improving the performance of the power plant. The results of the exergy analysis show that total exergy production rate and exergy efficiency of the GPP are 21 MW and 14.52%, respectively, after removing parasitic loads. The highest amount of exergy destruction occurs, respectively, in condenser 2, vaporizer HH2, condenser 1, pumps 1 and 2 as components requiring priority performance improvement. To maximize the system exergy efficiency, the artificial bee colony (ABC) is applied to the model that simulates the actual GPP. Under all the optimization conditions, the maximum exergy efficiency for the GPP and its components is obtained. Two of these conditions such as Case 4 related to the turbine and Case 12 related to the condenser have the best performance. As a result, the ABC optimization method provides better quality information than exergy analysis. Based on the guidance of this study, the performance of power plants based on geothermal energy and other energy resources may be improved.

[1]  Keng Choon Lee,et al.  Classification of geothermal resources by exergy , 2001 .

[2]  Alessandro Franco,et al.  Optimal design of binary cycle power plants for water-dominated, medium-temperature geothermal fields , 2009 .

[3]  Musbaudeen O. Bamgbopa,et al.  Numerical analysis of an organic Rankine cycle under steady and variable heat input , 2013 .

[4]  Ruggero Bertani,et al.  Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report , 2012 .

[5]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Energy and Exergy Analysis of Kizildere Geothermal Power Plant, Turkey , 2006 .

[6]  Vahab Hassani,et al.  Value analysis of advanced heat rejection systems for geothermal power plants , 1996, IECEC 96. Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[7]  Alexander Mitsos,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant , 2013 .

[8]  Francesco Calise,et al.  Thermoeconomic analysis and off-design performance of an organic Rankine cycle powered by medium-temperature heat sources , 2014 .

[9]  Mathieu Sellier,et al.  An iterative method for modelling the air‐cooled organic Rankine cycle geothermal power plant , 2011 .

[10]  B. Sharp,et al.  Role of royalties in sustainable geothermal energy development , 2015 .

[11]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A novel clustering approach: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems , 2017 .

[13]  Ben-Ran Fu,et al.  Performance of a 250 kW Organic Rankine Cycle System for Off-Design Heat Source Conditions , 2014 .

[14]  Y. R. Mayhew,et al.  Engineering Thermodynamics: Work and Heat Transfer , 1967 .

[15]  Alberto Benato,et al.  Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle , 2017 .

[16]  César R. Chamorro,et al.  World geothermal power production status: Energy, environmental and economic study of high enthalpy technologies , 2012 .

[17]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) Optimization Algorithm for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems , 2007, IFSA.

[18]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Pure and Pseudo-pure Fluid Thermophysical Property Evaluation and the Open-Source Thermophysical Property Library CoolProp , 2014, Industrial & engineering chemistry research.

[19]  Mathieu Sellier,et al.  Efficiency improvement for geothermal power generation to meet summer peak demand , 2009 .

[20]  Eray Uzgoren,et al.  Mass-conserving dynamic organic Rankine cycle model to investigate the link between mass distribution and system state , 2015 .

[21]  W. Worek,et al.  Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources , 2007 .

[22]  Halim Gurgenci Performance of power plants with organic Rankine cycles under part-load and off-design conditions , 1986 .

[23]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Exergy analysis of a dual-level binary geothermal power plant , 2002 .

[24]  S. Quoilin,et al.  CoolProp: An open-source reference-quality thermophysical property library , 2013 .

[25]  R. Dipippo Geothermal power plants : principles, applications, case studies and environmental impact , 2008 .

[26]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm , 2009, Appl. Math. Comput..

[27]  L. Pierobon,et al.  Analysis of hot spots in boilers of organic Rankine cycle units during transient operation , 2015 .

[28]  James E. Braun,et al.  Development and a Validation of a Charge Sensitive Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Simulation Tool , 2016 .

[29]  Yi Wu,et al.  Off-design performance comparison of an organic Rankine cycle under different control strategies , 2015 .

[30]  Giovanna Cavazzini,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility study of the integration of a commercial small-scale ORC in a real case study , 2015 .

[31]  Wenhua Li,et al.  Operation optimization of an organic rankine cycle (ORC) heat recovery power plant , 2011 .

[32]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids , 2004 .

[33]  Sandra Fillebrown,et al.  The MathWorks' MATLAB , 1996 .

[34]  Musbaudeen O. Bamgbopa,et al.  Quasi-dynamic model for an organic Rankine cycle , 2013 .

[35]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Design Optimization Using Exergoeconomics , 1999 .

[36]  D. J. Ryley,et al.  Sourcebook on the production of electricity from geothermal energy , 1980 .

[37]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems in off-design conditions: An experimentally-validated comparative study , 2017 .

[38]  Ulrich Leopold,et al.  GIS-based modelling of shallow geothermal energy potential for CO2 emission mitigation in urban areas , 2016 .

[39]  Arif İleri,et al.  Energy and exergy utilization in Turkey during 1995 , 1998 .

[40]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..

[42]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Off-design performance analysis of a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle , 2014 .

[43]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  A key review on performance improvement aspects of geothermal district heating systems and applications , 2007 .

[44]  Mary H. Dickson,et al.  What is Geothermal Energy? , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[45]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  Waste heat recovery technologies for offshore platforms , 2014 .

[46]  Alberto Mirandola,et al.  The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design , 2016 .

[47]  Giovanna Cavazzini,et al.  A PSO (particle swarm optimization)-based model for the optimal management of a small PV(Photovoltaic)-pump hydro energy storage in a rural dry area , 2014 .

[48]  Niyazi Aksoy,et al.  Economic assessment of geothermal district heating systems: A case study of Balcova–Narlidere, Turkey , 2006 .

[49]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  AN IDEA BASED ON HONEY BEE SWARM FOR NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION , 2005 .

[50]  Andrea Toffolo,et al.  An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy , 2013 .