Target localization and signature extraction in GPR data using expectation-maximization and principal component analysis

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a very promising technology for subsurface threat detection. A successful algorithm employing GPR should achieve high detection rates at a low false-alarm rate and do so at operationally relevant speeds. GPRs measure reflections at dielectric boundaries that occur at the interfaces between different materials. These boundaries may occur at any depth, within the sensor's range, and furthermore, the dielectric changes could be such that they induce a 180 degree phase shift in the received signal relative to the emitted GPR pulse. As a result of these time-of-arrival and phase variations, extracting robust features from target responses in GPR is not straightforward. In this work, a method to mitigate polarity and alignment variations based on an expectation-maximization (EM) principal-component analysis (PCA) approach is proposed. This work demonstrates how model-based target alignment can significantly improve detection performance. Performance is measured according to the improvement in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for classification before and after the data is properly aligned and phase-corrected.

[1]  Roland Göcke,et al.  Pose Normalization via Learned 2D Warping for Fully Automatic Face Recognition , 2011, BMVC.

[2]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[3]  Y. P. Shkolnikov Weighted principal component analysis for real-time background removal in GPR data , 2012, Other Conferences.

[4]  Joseph N. Wilson,et al.  An Investigation of Using the Spectral Characteristics From Ground Penetrating Radar for Landmine/Clutter Discrimination , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Jiwen Lu,et al.  Transform-Invariant PCA: A Unified Approach to Fully Automatic FaceAlignment, Representation, and Recognition , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[7]  James M. Keller,et al.  Automatic detection system for buried explosive hazards in FL-LWIR based on soft feature extraction using a bank of Gabor energy filters , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Raman K. Mehra,et al.  Automatic mine detection based on ground-penetrating radar , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[10]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Application of image categorization methods for buried threat detection in GPR data , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  P.A. Torrione,et al.  Performance of an adaptive feature-based processor for a wideband ground penetrating radar system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  J. Roberts,et al.  Robust entropy-guided image segmentation for ground detection in GPR , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  L.P. Ligthart,et al.  Alternating-sign windowed energy projection of SAR focused GPR data , 2005, European Radar Conference, 2005. EURAD 2005..

[14]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Blur Invariant Translational Image Registration for $N$-fold Symmetric Blurs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[16]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Texture Features for Antitank Landmine Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Jose Gonzalez-Mora,et al.  Efficient image alignment using linear appearance models , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Hyperbolic and PLSDA filter algorithms to detect buried threats in GPR data , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.