Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems; can they become the standard practice for performing cardiac surgery?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Maniadakis,et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation; an economic analysis. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[2] C. Asteriou,et al. Enhanced recovery after elective coronary revascularization surgery with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a prospective randomized study. , 2013, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[3] A. Haidich,et al. Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[4] C. Foroulis,et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation reduces the incidence of postoperative major adverse events after elective coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients. A single-institutional prospective randomized study , 2013, Perfusion.
[5] P. Jungebluth,et al. Minimized perfusion circuits: an alternative in the surgical treatment of Jehovah’s Witnesses , 2013, Perfusion.
[6] A. Simons,et al. Can minimized cardiopulmonary bypass systems be safer? , 2012, Perfusion.
[7] R. Hetzer,et al. In Intensive Care Cardiovascular Anesthesia Expert Opinion , 2022 .
[8] T. Hájek,et al. Are minimized perfusion circuits the better heart lung machines? Final results of a prospective randomized multicentre study , 2011, Perfusion.
[9] H. Hausmann,et al. Evaluation of hemodynamic and regional tissue perfusion effects of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC). , 2010, The journal of extra-corporeal technology.
[10] G. Rakhorst,et al. Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[11] A. Liebold,et al. Four years' experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical outcome. , 2004, Artificial organs.