Health-Related Quality of Life and Utilities Among Patients With Depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs

Objective: This study establishes veteran-specific utility measures for patients with and those without depression. Methods: A crosssectional study was conducted of 87,797 Veterans Affairs (VA) patients who had completed the 12Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) portion of the VA’s Large Health Survey of Veteran Enrollees administered in 1999 (58,442 veterans had an ICD-9 diagnosis of depression and 29,355 did not have such a diagnosis). Results: All demographic and clinical comparisons were statistically significant between the two groups. Compared with veterans without depression, those with depression had lower mental component scores and physical component scores, indicating worse health. Utilities, an indication of health state, were lower for veterans with depression, indicating worse health. Conclusions: This is the first national study of utilities among veterans with and those without depression. Future research should investigate how treatment interventions may affect utilities and develop broader cost-effectiveness models of VA depression care. (Psychiatric Services 59: 1331–1334, 2008)

[1]  P. Pirraglia,et al.  Cost-utility analysis studies of depression management: a systematic review. , 2004, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  J. Brazier,et al.  The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12 , 2004, Medical care.

[3]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Monitoring Depression Care: In Search of an Accurate Quality Indicator , 2004, Medical care.

[4]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Measurement Strategies Designed and Tested in the Veterans Health Study , 2004, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[5]  Robert M Kaplan,et al.  Use of the quality of well-being self-administered version (QWB-SA) in assessing health-related quality of life in depressed patients. , 2003, Journal of affective disorders.

[6]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[7]  J. Zeber,et al.  The CostUtility of Screening for Depression in Primary Care , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  P M Layde,et al.  Are patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  L. Kazis,et al.  Health-related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs: results from the Veterans Health Study. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  D A Revicki,et al.  Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by depression severity and antidepressant medications. , 1998, Journal of affective disorders.

[11]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[12]  K W Kizer,et al.  From the Veterans Health Administration. , 1996, JAMA.

[13]  G. Torrance Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[14]  E. Post,et al.  Veterans Health Administration primary care-mental health integration initiative. , 2008, North Carolina medical journal.

[15]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .