Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: a case study.

BACKGROUND The selection of medical textiles is an important subject for the health care sector in terms of benefits and costs. The basic cost calculation does not always yield to proper results in product selection; it would even mislead. It is usually a complicated task to give a decision whether to use reusable or single-use products, especially when the patient and surgeons lives are in consideration. The objective of the present paper is to carry out a cost/benefit study to help hospital managers and surgical team in comparing reusable and single-use surgical gowns and drapes. METHODS A detailed case study was carried out to determine the net benefits and costs associated with reusable and single-use surgical gown and drape use in the University of Gaziantep Hospital. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to evaluate qualitative benefit data. The relevant data were determined through the literature research and interviews with the doctors, administrators, and personnel of related departments (such as infection control, cleaning, and others) in the hospital. The benefit/cost ratios of the alternatives have been examined, and a sensitivity analysis has been carried out to measure the impact of changes in costs and benefits. CONCLUSION After the study, it is concluded that, even though cost is relatively higher, single-use gown and drape sets provide the highest benefit rates. Reduction of prices of single-use sets will make them more competitive and attractive in the health care sector.

[1]  H. Burger,et al.  Surgical or medical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: a cost–benefit analysis , 2002, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[2]  Kathleen McKenzie Hailey Identification of the Major Cost Drivers within a Medical Nonwovens Pipeline , 2003 .

[3]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001‐based EMS , 1999 .

[4]  M. Kollef,et al.  A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Gown Use in Controlling Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Transmission Is It Worth the Price? , 2004, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  H Laufman,et al.  A critical review of a century's progress in surgical apparel: how far have we come? , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[6]  R. Garibaldi,et al.  Comparison of nonwoven and woven gown and drape fabric to prevent intraoperative wound contamination and postoperative infection. , 1986, American journal of surgery.

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory , 2000 .

[8]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Assessing success factors for implementing CE a case study in Hong Kong electronics industry by AHP , 1997 .

[10]  G A Colditz,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses in the Medical Literature , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  J. Bellchambers,et al.  A prospective study of wound infection in coronary artery surgery. , 1999, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

[12]  B. Baldwin,et al.  Affect of disposable draping on wound infection rate. , 1981, Virginia medical.

[13]  L. Murphy Cost/benefit study of reusable and disposable OR draping materials. , 1993, Journal of healthcare materiel management.

[14]  J. Odom,et al.  Cost containment in the operating room: use of reusable versus disposable clothing. , 1992, The American surgeon.

[15]  Use of disposable products in surgical practice. , 1976, Archives of surgery.

[16]  Eng Ung Choo,et al.  Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  J. Moylan,et al.  Reducing wound infections. Improved gown and drape barrier performance. , 1987, Archives of surgery.

[18]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .