Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Ioannidis,et al. Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[2] L. Cardon,et al. Replication Publication , 2005, PLoS biology.
[3] J. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[4] J. Ioannidis. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. , 2005, JAMA.
[5] H. Parthasarathy,et al. The PLoS Community Journals , 2005, PLoS biology.
[6] Barbara Cohen. PLoS Biology in Action , 2004, PLoS biology.
[7] J. Ioannidis. Materializing research promises: opportunities, priorities and conflicts in translational medicine , 2004, Journal of Translational Medicine.
[8] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.
[9] Richard Horton,et al. The hidden research paper. , 2002, JAMA.
[10] D. Moher,et al. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[11] M Docherty,et al. The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers , 1999, BMJ.
[12] P. Easterbrook,et al. Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.