Creating Paper Robots increases designers’ confidence to prototype with microcontrollers and electronics

Abstract This article describes a creative design activity to introduce engineering students to mechatronic prototyping. Our goal was to find a creative task to increase student confidence and skills in mechanical design, electrical circuits, microcontrollers, and programming. We present the Paper Robot exercise, a design activity that blends everyday materials such as cardboard, with electronic components. This activity was introduced during the 2010–2011 academic year and has been repeated every year since, in a global, industry-sponsored design course at Stanford University. The Paper Robot exercise resulted from the observation that students were intimidated to create functional prototypes with microcontrollers. The teaching team needed a way to quickly introduce tools for programming electronic components and to encourage creative experimentation early in the course. Results include a 100% task performance rate of students that successfully made a robot meeting the minimum requirements. 76% of students reported an increase in knowledge in programming microcontrollers (Arduino), and 69% increased their knowledge in creating electronic circuits out of raw components. This activity may be modified to introduce younger students to mechatronic platforms in STEM education curriculum.

[1]  Martin C. Carlisle,et al.  Tools for teaching introductory programming: what works? , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[2]  Moti Frank,et al.  Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course , 2003 .

[3]  Casey Reas,et al.  Processing: a programming handbook for visual designers and artists , 2007 .

[4]  Panagiotis Kritikakos,et al.  Low-Power High Performance Computing , 2011 .

[5]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Bloctopus: A Novice Modular Sensor System for Playful Prototyping , 2015, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[6]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[7]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  A mobile interactive robot for gathering structured social video , 2011, ACM Multimedia.

[8]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses , 1997 .

[9]  Rhona Sharpe,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age , 2007 .

[10]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[11]  Gareth Halfacree,et al.  Meet the Raspberry Pi , 2016 .

[12]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  How Young Children Learn to Program With Sensor, Action, and Logic Blocks , 2008 .

[13]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Gears of our childhood: constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future , 2013, IDC.

[14]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets , 2001, UIST '01.

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[16]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  The GoGo Board: Moving towards highly available computational tools in learning environments , 2002 .

[17]  David N. Rocheleau,et al.  Mechatronics/microcontroller education for mechanical engineering students at the University of South Carolina , 2005 .

[18]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  d . tools : Integrated Prototyping for Physical Interaction Design , 2005 .

[19]  Stefano Squartini,et al.  LOW POWER HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ON THE BEAGLEBOARD PLATFORM , 2012 .

[20]  Jie Qi,et al.  Microcontrollers as material: crafting circuits with paper, conductive ink, electronic components, and an "untoolkit" , 2013, TEI '13.