Micelle-like clusters in phase-separated Nanog condensates: A molecular simulation study

The phase separation model for transcription suggests that transcription factors (TFs), coactivators, and RNA polymerases form biomolecular condensates around active gene loci and regulate transcription. However, the structural details of condensates remain elusive. In this study, for Nanog, a master TF in mammalian embryonic stem cells known to form protein condensates in vitro, we examined protein structures in the condensates using residue-level coarse-grained molecular simulations. Human Nanog formed micelle-like clusters in the condensate. In the micelle-like cluster, the C-terminal disordered domains, including the tryptophan repeat (WR) regions, interacted with each other near the cluster center primarily via hydrophobic interaction. In contrast, hydrophilic disordered N-terminal and DNA-binding domains were exposed on the surface of the clusters. Electrostatic attractions of these surface residues were responsible for bridging multiple micelle-like structures in the condensate. The micelle-like structure and condensate were dynamic and liquid-like. Mutation of tryptophan residues in the WR region which was implicated to be important for a Nanog function resulted in dissolution of the Nanog condensate. Finally, to examine the impact of Nanog cluster to DNA, we added DNA fragments to the Nanog condensate. Nanog DNA-binding domains exposed to the surface of the micelle-like cluster could recruit more than one DNA fragments, making DNA-DNA distance shorter. Author summary In eukaryotic transcription regulation, enhancer elements far from the promoter are known to modulate transcriptional activity, but the molecular mechanism remains elusive. One of these models, the phase separation model, suggests that transcription factors (TFs), coactivators, and transcription machinery form biomolecular condensates that include enhancer and promoter elements, making enhancer-promoter communication possible via the protein network in the condensate. Nanog, one of the core TFs involved in mammalian embryonic stem cells, has been reported to have the ability to form condensates. In this study, we addressed the structural details of Nanog condensates by performing residue-level coarse-grained molecular simulations. We found that Nanog formed micelle-like clusters via primarily hydrophobic interactions between tryptophan repeat regions in the C-terminal disordered domains within the condensate. On the other hand, highly charged N-terminal and DNA-binding domains were exposed to the surface of the micelle and were responsible for bridging many micelles into a condensate. The micelle-like clusters and condensate were dynamic and liquid-like. In addition, Nanog condensates could induce DNA-DNA attraction mediated by micelle-like structures.

[1]  J. Ferreon,et al.  NANOG prion-like assembly mediates DNA bridging to facilitate chromatin reorganization and activation of pluripotency , 2022, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  Andrew P. Latham,et al.  On the stability and layered organization of protein-DNA condensates. , 2022, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Jerelle A. Joseph,et al.  Physics-driven coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation with near-quantitative accuracy , 2021, Nature Computational Science.

[4]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Accurate model of liquid–liquid phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins from optimization of single-chain properties , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Implementation of residue-level coarse-grained models in GENESIS for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  Jianlong Wang,et al.  Phase separation of OCT4 controls TAD reorganization to promote cell fate transitions. , 2021, Cell stem cell.

[7]  Young C. Kim,et al.  Improved coarse‐grained model for studying sequence dependent phase separation of disordered proteins , 2021, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  R. Best,et al.  A Data-Driven Hydrophobicity Scale for Predicting Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Proteins. , 2021, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  N. Hannett,et al.  RNA-Mediated Feedback Control of Transcriptional Condensates , 2020, Cell.

[10]  I. Chambers,et al.  Phosphorylation of NANOG by casein kinase I regulates embryonic stem cell self‐renewal , 2020, FEBS letters.

[11]  G. Hummer,et al.  Simulation of FUS Protein Condensates with an Adapted Coarse-Grained Model , 2020, bioRxiv.

[12]  B. Baradaran,et al.  The oncogenic potential of NANOG: An important cancer induction mediator , 2020, Journal of cellular physiology.

[13]  S. Takada,et al.  Nucleosome allostery in pioneer transcription factor binding , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  A. Pertsinidis,et al.  Single-gene imaging links genome topology, promoter-enhancer communication and transcription control , 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[15]  M. Feig,et al.  Crowded environment affects the activity and inhibition of the NS3/4A protease. , 2020, Biochimie.

[16]  Jerelle A. Joseph,et al.  Reentrant liquid condensate phase of proteins is stabilized by hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[17]  V. Levi,et al.  Dynamical reorganization of the pluripotency transcription factors Oct4 and Sox2 during early differentiation of embryonic stem cells , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Matthew C. Good,et al.  Identifying Sequence Perturbations to an Intrinsically Disordered Protein that Determine Its Phase Separation Behavior , 2020, bioRxiv.

[19]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Gō model revisited , 2019, Biophysics and physicobiology.

[20]  A. Pertsinidis,et al.  Single-Molecule Nanoscopy Elucidates RNA Polymerase II Transcription at Single Genes in Live Cells , 2019, Cell.

[21]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  Molecular interactions underlying liquid-liquid phase separation of the FUS low complexity domain , 2019, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[22]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  TDP-43 α-helical structure tunes liquid–liquid phase separation and function , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Hannett,et al.  Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains , 2018, Cell.

[24]  Wenwei Zheng,et al.  Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model , 2017, bioRxiv.

[25]  Ming Zhang,et al.  LIF-activated Jak signaling determines Esrrb expression during late-stage reprogramming , 2017, Biology Open.

[26]  Yasuhiro Matsunaga,et al.  GENESIS 1.1: A hybrid‐parallel molecular dynamics simulator with enhanced sampling algorithms on multiple computational platforms , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  Sharon E. Torigoe,et al.  A dynamic interplay of enhancer elements regulates Klf4 expression in naïve pluripotency , 2017, Genes & development.

[28]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Sequence-dependent nucleosome sliding in rotation-coupled and uncoupled modes revealed by molecular simulations , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  Phosphorylation of the FUS low‐complexity domain disrupts phase separation, aggregation, and toxicity , 2017, The EMBO journal.

[30]  A. Rowe,et al.  Distinct Contributions of Tryptophan Residues within the Dimerization Domain to Nanog Function , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Jianlong Wang,et al.  Context-Dependent Functions of NANOG Phosphorylation in Pluripotency and Reprogramming , 2017, Stem cell reports.

[32]  R. Young,et al.  A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.

[33]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Dynamic Coupling among Protein Binding, Sliding, and DNA Bending Revealed by Molecular Dynamics. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Modeling Structural Dynamics of Biomolecular Complexes by Coarse-Grained Molecular Simulations. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[35]  Yasuhiro Matsunaga,et al.  GENESIS: a hybrid-parallel and multi-scale molecular dynamics simulator with enhanced sampling algorithms for biomolecular and cellular simulations , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.

[36]  Mitchell D. Miller,et al.  Structure-based discovery of NANOG variant with enhanced properties to promote self-renewal and reprogramming of pluripotent stem cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Energy landscape views for interplays among folding, binding, and allostery of calmodulin domains , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Juan J de Pablo,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of DNA curvature. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Single-Molecule Dynamics of Enhanceosome Assembly in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[40]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[41]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Coarse-grained molecular simulations of large biomolecules. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  Oliver Beckstein,et al.  MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[43]  Stuart H. Orkin,et al.  Chromatin Connections to Pluripotency and Cellular Reprogramming , 2011, Cell.

[44]  Shoji Takada,et al.  CafeMol: A Coarse-Grained Biomolecular Simulator for Simulating Proteins at Work. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[45]  H. Ng,et al.  The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  Richard A Young,et al.  Control of the Embryonic Stem Cell State , 2011, Cell.

[47]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells , 2009, Nature.

[49]  S. Orkin,et al.  Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  B. Nijmeijer,et al.  The pluripotency rheostat Nanog functions as a dimer. , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[51]  D. Pei,et al.  Identification of two distinct transactivation domains in the pluripotency sustaining factor nanog , 2003, Cell Research.

[52]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[53]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[54]  R. Hjelm,et al.  A neutron scattering study of poly(ethylene glycol) in electrolyte solutions , 1995 .

[55]  Y. Chevalier,et al.  The structure of micelles and microemulsions , 1990 .

[56]  J. E. Martin,et al.  The hard‐sphere model for linear and regular star polybutadienes , 1989 .

[57]  Oliver Beckstein,et al.  MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2016, SciPy.

[58]  A. Gautam,et al.  STATE , 2016, Intell. Serv. Robotics.

[59]  J. Brumbaugh,et al.  NANOG Is Multiply Phosphorylated and Directly Modified by ERK2 and CDK1 In Vitro. , 2014, Stem cell reports.