Toward real-world evaluations of trunk exoskeletons using inertial measurement units

Trunk exoskeletons are an emerging technology that could reduce spinal loading, guide trunk motion, and augment lifting ability. However, while they have achieved promising results in brief laboratory studies, they have not yet been tested in longer-term real-world studies – partially due to reliance on stationary sensors such as cameras. To enable future real-world evaluations of trunk exoskeletons, this paper describes two preliminary studies on using inertial measurement units (IMUs) to collect kinematic data from an exoskeleton wearer. In the first study, a participant performed three activities (walking, sit-to-stand, box lifting) while trunk flexion angle was measured with both IMUs and reference cameras. The mean absolute difference in flexion angle between the two methods was 1.4° during walking, 3.6° during sit-to-stand and 5.2° during box lifting, showing that IMUs can measure trunk flexion with a reasonable accuracy. In the second study, six participants performed five activities (standing, sitting straight, slouching, ‘good’ lifting, ‘bad’ lifting), and a naïve Bayes classifier was used to automatically classify the activity from IMU data. The classification accuracy was 92.2%, indicating the feasibility of automated activity classification using IMUs. The IMUs will next be used to obtain longer-term recordings of different activities performed both with and without a trunk exoskeleton to determine how the exoskeleton affects a person’s posture and behavior.

[1]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Active Spinal Orthosis to Reduce Lumbar Postural Muscle Activity in Flexed Postures , 2016 .

[2]  Domenico Formica,et al.  On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  M. de Looze,et al.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. , 2018, Applied Ergonomics.

[4]  Qin Zhu,et al.  Mid-flight lateral trunk bending increased ipsilateral leg loading during landing: a center of mass analysis , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  Haniye Sadat Sajadi,et al.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2018, The Lancet.

[6]  Tobias Nef,et al.  Evaluation of Three State-of-the-Art Classifiers for Recognition of Activities of Daily Living from Smart Home Ambient Data , 2012, Sensors.

[7]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[8]  Guido Pasquini,et al.  Online Phase Detection Using Wearable Sensors for Walking with a Robotic Prosthesis , 2014, Sensors.

[9]  Jörg Krüger,et al.  Analysis of ergonomic and unergonomic human lifting behaviors by using Inertial Measurement Units , 2017 .

[10]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  Domen Novak,et al.  Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Reconfigurable Spinal Exoskeleton , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[13]  Roger Gassert,et al.  A method to qualitatively assess arm use in stroke survivors in the home environment , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.