Functional basis for the preference for slow movement in area 17 of the cat

[1]  G. Orban,et al.  Receptive field structure of area 19 as compared to area 17 of the cat , 1982, Brain Research.

[2]  K. Albus,et al.  Topography and cortical projections of morphologically identified neurons in the visual thalamus of the cat , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  Is stimulus movement of particular importance in the functioning of cat visual cortex? , 1981, Brain Research.

[4]  L. Palmer,et al.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Orban,et al.  Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Orban,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1981, Brain Research.

[7]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  A W Goodwin,et al.  The influence of stimulus velocity on the responses of single neurones in the striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  H. Vanegas,et al.  The projection from the lateral geniculate nucleus onto the visual cortex in the cat. A quantitative study with horseradish‐peroxidase , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  J. Movshon.  The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  B. Dreher,et al.  Receptive field analysis: responses to moving visual contours by single lateral geniculate neurones in the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Interaction effects of visual contours on the discharge frequency of simple striate neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.