Stroke-direction preferences in drawing and handwriting

Meulenbroek, R.G.J. and A.J.W.M. Thomassen, 1991. Stroke-direction preferences in drawing and handwriting. Human Movement Science 10, 247-270. The aim of the present study is to examine the contribution of two independent spatial reference sytems in the manipulation of writing instruments. One system relates to the anatomical structure of the arm and the hand (resulting in preferences for oblique, i.e., diagonal movement directions) while the other corresponds with a more abstract, geometrical system (resulting in a bias favouring orthogonal, i.e., vertical and horizontal movement directions). Three experiments are reported in which the independence of these two reference systems is explored in drawing tasks in which subjects produced small back-and-forth movements in a variety of directions. The outcome of the first experiment showed that stroke-direction variability is larger in horizontal than in other directions. In experiment 2 it was predicted that when subjects are forced to choose repeatedly among a set of 16 different directions, a change of arm position would affect the pattern of preferences for oblique directions more than the pattern of preferences for orthogonal directions. The data confirm this hypothesis. In experiment 3 we analysed the changes in stroke-direction preferences as a function of variations in the type and the sire of the movements to be produced as well as the effects of visual control of the motor task on the subjects’ choice of movement directions. This last experiment provides additional evidence for the view that geometrical and anatomical reference systems must be distinguished. Finally, a frame-by-frame analysis of videorecordings of hand and finger movements indicates that the two anatomical subsystems cooperate consistently and predictably during the production of different movement directions.

[1]  W. G. Koster,et al.  Analysis and Synthesis of Handwriting , 1967 .

[2]  J. Goodnow,et al.  “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children's copying☆ , 1973 .

[3]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  9 Egocentric Referents in Human Limb Orientation , 1980 .

[4]  M. Corballis,et al.  The Psychology of Left and Right , 2020 .

[5]  P L Harris,et al.  Orientation of the Diamond and the Square , 1976, Perception.

[6]  G. V. Galen,et al.  The Acquisition of Skilled Handwriting: Discontinuous Trends in Kinematic Variables , 1988 .

[7]  O. Meijer,et al.  Complex movement behaviour : 'the' motor-action controversy , 1988 .

[8]  A. Colley,et al.  Cognition and action in skilled behaviour , 1988 .

[9]  J. Shea,et al.  Knowledge incorporation in motor representation , 1988 .

[10]  Norman H. Freeman,et al.  Strategies of representation in young children : analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes , 1980 .

[11]  Phillip J. Bairstow,et al.  Perceptual-motor Behaviour: Developmental Assessment and Therapy , 1985 .

[12]  M. Annett The Binomial Distribution of Right, Mixed and Left Handedness , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J I Laszlo,et al.  The drawing of squares and diamonds: a perceptual-motor task analysis. , 1987, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  P. Sommers A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology , 1989 .

[15]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE ROLE OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND THE MOTOR BUFFER IN HANDWRITING UNDER VISUAL AND NON-VISUAL GUIDANCE , 1989 .

[16]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  Digital recording and processing of handwriting movements , 1984 .

[17]  P. Sommers Drawing and cognition: Innovations, primitives, contour, and space in children's drawings , 1984 .

[18]  E. H. Dooijes Analysis of handwriting movements , 1983 .

[19]  J. Rieser,et al.  Reference systems and the perception of tactual and haptic orientation , 1976 .

[20]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  A DESCRIPTION OF HANDWRITING IN TERMS OF MAIN AXES , 1989 .

[22]  J. Elliott,et al.  A CLASSIFICATION OF MANIPULATIVE HAND MOVEMENTS , 1984, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[23]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.

[24]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  F. J. Maarse The study of handwriting movement: peripheral models and signal processing techniques , 1987 .

[26]  J. Levy,et al.  Variations in cerebral organization as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Computer recognition and human production of handwriting , 1989 .

[28]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .