Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis?

AbstractSurgical intervention is an important option for treating spinal tuberculosis. Previous studies have reported different surgical procedures and bone grafts for it. To our knowledge, few studies demonstrated the clinical results of using nonstructural autogenous bone graft in surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis.The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical management lumbar spinal tuberculosis by one-stage posterior debridement with nonstructural autogenous bone grafting and instrumentation versus anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation.A total of 58 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment due to lumbar spinal tuberculosis from January 2011 to December 2013 were included. A total of 22 patients underwent one-stage posterior debridement, nonstructural autogenous bone grafting, and instrumentation (group A), and 36 patients received anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation (group B). The operative duration, total blood loss, perioperative transfusion, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and complications were recorded. The bony fusion of the graft was assessed by computed tomography scans. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients in the 2 groups.All the patients were followed up, with a mean follow-up duration of 21.6 ± 5.7 months in group A and 22.3 ± 6.2 months in group B (P = 0.47). The average operative duration was 257.5 ± 91.1 minutes in group A and 335.7 ± 91.0 minutes in group B (P = 0.002). The mean total blood loss was 769.6 ± 150.9 mL in group A and 1048.6 ± 556.9 mL in group B (P = 0.007). Also, significant differences were found between the 2 groups in perioperative transfusion volumes, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization cost (P < 0.05), which were less in group A compared with group B. Patients with ASIA grade C/D in the 2 groups were improved with 1 to 2 grades after the surgery with no statistical difference (P = 1.000). The perioperative complications rate was 9.1% (2/22) in group A and 13.9% (5/36) in group B (P = 0.897).Based on a retrospective study, the procedure of one-stage posterior debridement, nonstructural autogenous bone grafting, and instrumentation has a significant shorter operative duration, lower blood loss and perioperative transfusion, shorter hospital stay, and less hospitalization cost compared with the one of anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation for treating lumber spinal tuberculosis.

[1]  H. Zeng,et al.  One-stage posterior-only approach in surgical treatment of single-segment thoracic spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficits in adults: a retrospective study of 34 cases , 2015, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  Jiaming Liu,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Versus Combined Posterior and Anterior Approach for the Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis. , 2015, World neurosurgery.

[3]  Xinhua Yin,et al.  One-stage combined anterior-posterior approach treatment of multiple cervicothoracic spinal tuberculosis with kyphosis , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  S. Bilgiç,et al.  Spinal Tuberculosis , 2015, Journal of experimental neuroscience.

[5]  Monchai Ruangchainikom,et al.  The outcomes of combined posterior instrumentation and anterior radical debridement with fusion for multilevel spinal tuberculosis. , 2014, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[6]  Jiaming Liu,et al.  One-Stage Posterior Debridement and Transpedicular Screw Fixation for Treating Monosegmental Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis in Adults , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  X. Pang,et al.  One-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation vs. single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[8]  H. Zeng,et al.  Posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches in surgical management of lumbosacral tuberculosis with paraspinal abscess in adults , 2014, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[9]  Xifeng Zhang,et al.  Management of spinal tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, The Journal of international medical research.

[10]  Yueming Song,et al.  One-stage posterior surgical treatment for lumbosacral tuberculosis with major vertebral body loss and kyphosis. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[11]  X. Pang,et al.  One-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, 360° interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation in treating lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis , 2013, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  Mingxing Tang,et al.  One-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation in treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case series , 2013, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[13]  Y. Matsuyama,et al.  Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[14]  J. Chen,et al.  Surgical management for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the elderly: posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[15]  Jian-Huang Wu,et al.  Surgical management by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation for lumbo-sacral tuberculosis in the aged , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[16]  K. Cheung,et al.  Surgical treatment of acute TB spondylitis: indications and outcomes , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[17]  B. Rossi,et al.  Surgical treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis. , 2012, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[18]  X. Yuan,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using spinous process and laminae. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  A. Jain,et al.  Instrumented stabilization in spinal tuberculosis , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[20]  E. Guerado,et al.  Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. An update , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[21]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Comparative study on the efficacy of two-staged (posterior followed by anterior) surgical treatment using spinal instrumentation on pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[22]  A. Jain,et al.  Simultaneously anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation by extrapleural retroperitoneal approach in thoracolumbar lesions , 2010, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[23]  R. Mannion,et al.  Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[24]  Huma Zaidi,et al.  Frequency and magnetic resonance imaging patterns of tuberculous spondylitis lesions in adults. , 2010, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[25]  A. Jain Tuberculosis of the spine. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  E. Acaroğlu,et al.  Anterior Instrumentation in Tuberculous Spondylitis: Is it Effective and Safe? , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  A. Jain,et al.  Tuberculosis of the Spine: A Review , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  Morphological Changes During Growth in Healed Childhood Spinal Tuberculosis A 15-year Prospective Study of 61 Children Treated With Ambulatory Chemotherapy , 2006, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[29]  H. Andress,et al.  Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. , 2003, Surgical infections.

[30]  J. Clarke,et al.  Medicine , 1907, Bristol medico-chirurgical journal.