Combination Analysis of Future Polar-Type Gravity Mission and GRACE Follow-On

Thanks to the unprecedented success of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), its successive mission GRACE Follow-On (GFO) has been in orbit since May 2018 to continue measuring the Earth’s mass transport. In order to possibly enhance GFO in terms of mass transport estimates, four orbit configurations of future polar-type gravity mission (FPG) (with the same payload accuracy and orbit parameters as GRACE, but differing in orbit inclination) are investigated by full-scale simulations in both standalone and jointly with GFO. The results demonstrate that the retrograde orbit modes used in FPG are generally superior to prograde in terms of gravity field estimation in the case of a joint GFO configuration. Considering the FPG’s independent capability, the orbit configurations with 89and 91-degree inclinations (namely FPG-89 and FPG-91) are further analyzed by joint GFO monthly gravity field models over the period of one-year. Our analyses show that the FPG-91 basically outperforms the FPG-89 in mass change estimates, especially at the mediumand low-latitude regions. Compared to GFO & FPG-89, about 22% noise reduction over the ocean area and 17% over land areas are achieved by the GFO & FPG-91 combined model. Therefore, the FPG-91 is worthy to be recommended for the further orbit design of FPGs.

[1]  Jürgen Kusche,et al.  The updated ESA Earth System Model for future gravity mission simulation studies , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[2]  William M. Folkner,et al.  Alternative mission architectures for a gravity recovery satellite mission , 2009 .

[3]  B. Tapley,et al.  Quantification of Ocean Mass Change Using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, Satellite Altimeter, and Argo Floats Observations , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[4]  W. Feng,et al.  Evaluation of groundwater depletion in North China using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and ground‐based measurements , 2013 .

[5]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Estimating low resolution gravity fields at short time intervals to reduce temporal aliasing errors , 2011 .

[6]  Yunzhong Shen,et al.  An improved GRACE monthly gravity field solution by modeling the non-conservative acceleration and attitude observation errors , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[7]  D. Wiese Optimizing Two Pairs of GRACE-like Satellites for Recovering Temporal Gravity Variations , 2011 .

[8]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[9]  J. Kusche,et al.  Comparing seven candidate mission configurations for temporal gravity field retrieval through full-scale numerical simulation , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[10]  Roland Pail,et al.  Treatment of ocean tide aliasing in the context of a next generation gravity field mission , 2014 .

[11]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  Precise accelerometry onboard the GRACE gravity field satellite mission , 2008 .

[12]  Olivier Francis,et al.  Tongji-Grace02s and Tongji-Grace02k: High-Precision Static GRACE-Only Global Earth's Gravity Field Models Derived by Refined Data Processing Strategies , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[13]  R. König,et al.  A new high-resolution model of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean mass variability for de-aliasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL06 , 2017 .

[14]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Space-borne gravimetric satellite constellations and ocean tides: aliasing effects , 2010 .

[15]  Roland Pail,et al.  Treatment of temporal aliasing effects in the context of next generation satellite gravimetry missions , 2017 .

[16]  Duane E. Waliser,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tides , 2008 .

[17]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  Antarctic regional ice loss rates from GRACE , 2008 .

[18]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Global sea-level budget 1993–present , 2018, Earth System Science Data.

[19]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Intersatellite laser ranging instrument for the GRACE follow-on mission , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[20]  Yunzhong Shen,et al.  Monthly gravity field solution from GRACE range measurements using modified short arc approach , 2015 .

[21]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  What Can be Expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science Applications? , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[22]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[23]  Rolf König,et al.  EIGEN-6C4 - The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 1949 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse , 2011 .

[24]  Jeongrae Kim,et al.  Simulation study of a low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission , 2000 .

[25]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Improvements in the Monthly Gravity Field Solutions Through Modeling the Colored Noise in the GRACE Data , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[26]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Signals & systems (2nd ed.) , 1996 .

[27]  Roland Klees,et al.  Analysis of star camera errors in GRACE data and their impact on monthly gravity field models , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[28]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[29]  J. Kusche,et al.  Mass Distribution and Mass Transport in the Earth System: Recent Scientific Progress Due to Interdisciplinary Research , 2014, Surveys in geophysics.

[30]  Wei Feng,et al.  GRAMAT: a comprehensive Matlab toolbox for estimating global mass variations from GRACE satellite data , 2018, Earth Science Informatics.

[31]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  The EGSIEM combination service: final results and further plans , 2018 .

[32]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[33]  J. Kusche,et al.  Modeling of present-day atmosphere and ocean non-tidal de-aliasing errors for future gravity mission simulations , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[34]  Ilias Daras Gravity field processing towards future LL-SST satellite missions , 2016 .

[35]  G. Heinzel,et al.  Instrument Data Simulations for GRACE Follow-on: Observation and Noise Models , 2017 .

[36]  C. Reigber,et al.  Gravity field recovery from satellite tracking data , 1989 .

[37]  C. Shum,et al.  Time‐variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field , 2004 .

[38]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[39]  O. Francis,et al.  Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004 , 2006 .

[40]  Yun Pan,et al.  Groundwater Storage Changes in China from Satellite Gravity: An Overview , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Fernando Sansò,et al.  International Summer School of Theoretical Geodesy on “Theory of Satellite Geodesy and Gravity Field Determination” , 1990 .

[42]  Yunzhong Shen,et al.  Monthly gravity field models derived from GRACE Level 1B data using a modified short‐arc approach , 2015 .

[43]  C. Reigber,et al.  CHAMP mission status , 2002 .

[44]  Stefano Cesare,et al.  Next Generation Gravity Mission , 2013 .

[45]  W. Bosch,et al.  EOT11A - Empirical Ocean Tide Model from Multi-Mission Satellite Altimetry , 2008 .

[46]  Zhicai Luo,et al.  Impact of Different Kinematic Empirical Parameters Processing Strategies on Temporal Gravity Field Model Determination , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[47]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Simulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[48]  Gravity Recovery from Formation Flight Missions , 2008 .

[49]  Tianyi Chen,et al.  Mass Flux Solution in the Tibetan Plateau Using Mascon Modeling , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[50]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy , 2000 .

[51]  Gerhard Beutler,et al.  Precise orbit determination for GRACE using undifferenced or doubly differenced GPS data , 2006 .

[52]  A. Jäggi,et al.  AIUB-RL02: an improved time-series of monthly gravity fields from GRACE data , 2016 .

[53]  R. Rummel,et al.  GOCE gravitational gradiometry , 2011 .

[54]  Houze Xu,et al.  Monthly gravity field recovery from GRACE orbits and K-band measurements using variational equations approach , 2015 .

[55]  David N. Wiese,et al.  A possible Dual-GRACE mission with 90 degree and 63 degree inclination orbits , 2008 .

[56]  Frank G. Lemoine,et al.  Design considerations for a dedicated gravity recovery satellite mission consisting of two pairs of satellites , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[57]  J. Kusche,et al.  Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model , 2009 .