A Comparison of CFD and Full-scale Measurements for Analysis of Natural Ventilation

Abstract CFD modelling techniques have been used to simulate the coupled external and internal flow in a cubic building with two dominant openings. CFD predictions of the time-averaged cross ventilation flow rates have been validated against full-scale experimental data under various weather conditions in England. RANS model predictions proved reliable when wind directions were near normal to the vent openings. However, when the fluctuating ventilation rate exceeded the mean flow, RANS models were incapable of predicting the total ventilation rate. Improved results are expected by applying more sophisticated turbulence models, such as LES or weighted quasi-steady approximations.

[1]  D. W. Etheridge.  Unsteady flow effects due to fluctuating wind pressures in natural ventilation design—instantaneous flow rates , 2000 .

[2]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Natural Ventilation in Buildings: Measurement in a Wind Tunnel and Numerical Simulation with Large Eddy Simulation , 2003 .

[3]  Yoshihiko Hayashi,et al.  Numerical study on velocity-pressure field and wind forces for bluff bodies by κ-ϵ, ASM and LES , 1992 .

[4]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Using computational tools to factor wind into architectural environment design , 2004 .

[5]  Shigeki Nishizawa,et al.  A Wind Tunnel Full-Scale Building Model Comparison between Experimental and CFD Results Based on the Standard k-ε Turbulence Representation , 2004 .

[6]  P. Richards,et al.  Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model , 1993 .

[7]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Effect of fluctuating wind direction on cross natural ventilation in buildings from large eddy simulation , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Richards,et al.  A 6 m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow -Part 2. Computational solutions , 2002 .

[9]  N. G. Wright,et al.  Non-linear k–ε turbulence model results for flow over a building at full-scale , 2003 .

[10]  S. Murakami,et al.  Development of a new k−ε model for flow and pressure fields around bluff body , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Richards,et al.  The influence of Reynolds stresses on roof pressure fluctuations , 1999 .

[12]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  A comparison of large Eddy simulations with a standard k–ε Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model for the prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow over a matrix of cubes , 2003 .

[13]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations , 1998 .

[14]  D. W. Etheridge,et al.  Direct wind tunnel modelling of natural ventilation for design purposes , 1999 .

[15]  Peter Richards,et al.  A 6m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow. Part I. Full-scale and wind-tunnel results , 2002 .

[16]  Bassam A. Younis,et al.  Geometric parameters that affect wind loads on low-rise buildings: full-scale and CFD experiments , 1993 .

[17]  Malcolm J. Cook,et al.  CFD Modelling of Natural Ventilation: Combined Wind and Buoyancy Forces , 2003 .

[18]  Matthew Peter Straw.  Computation and measurement of wind induced ventilation , 2000 .

[19]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[20]  M. Raw,et al.  Robustness of coupled Algebraic Multigrid for the Navier-Stokes equations , 1996 .

[21]  Adrian Gaylard,et al.  Bluff body asymmetric flow phenomenon - real effect or solver artefact? , 2002 .

[22]  Tong Yang,et al.  CFD and field testing of a naturally ventilated full-scale building , 2004 .