Diagnostic and prognostic role of the electrocardiogram in patients with pericarditis

Objective The ECG has been traditionally used to support the diagnosis of pericarditis. However, the pericardium is electrically silent and ECG changes may imply concurrent myocardial involvement rather than simple pericarditis. The aim of the present paper is to analyse the frequency, type and clinical implication of ECG changes in patients with pericarditis compared with those with myocarditis. Methods Consecutive patients with pericarditis and/or myocarditis were included in a prospective cohort study from January 2017 to December 2020. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6 months and then every 6 months. Cardiac magnetic resonance was used to diagnose concurrent myocarditis. Results 166 patients (median age 47 years, 95% CI 44 to 51) with 66 men (39.8%) were included: 110 cases with pericarditis (mean age 47.7 years, 29.1% male) and 56 cases with myocarditis (mean age 44.8, 60.7% male). ECG changes were reported in 61 of 166 (36.7%) patients: 27 of 110 (24.5%) among those with pericarditis and 34 of 56 (60.7%) among those with myocarditis (p<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ECG changes were associated with troponin elevation (risk ratio 1.97; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.43), suggesting myocardial involvement. ECG changes were not associated with increased risk of adverse events. Conclusions ECG changes, mainly widespread ST-segment elevation, can be recorded in about one-quarter of patients with pericarditis, and were not associated with a worse prognosis. These changes may reflect concurrent myocarditis that should be ruled out.

[1]  C. Autore,et al.  [ANMCO/SIC Consensus document on the management of myocarditis]. , 2020, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[2]  S. Heymans,et al.  Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions , 2020, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[3]  J. Grizzard,et al.  Management of Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Bogaert,et al.  Usefulness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Recurrent Pericarditis. , 2019, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  A. R. Pérez Riera,et al.  PR depression with multi‑lead ST elevation and ST depression in aVR: Is it always acute pericarditis? , 2019, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Wytyczne ESC dotyczące rozpoznawania i leczenia chorób osierdzia w 2015 roku , 2015 .

[8]  N. Al-Attar,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases , 2015, European heart journal.

[9]  F. Gaita,et al.  Evaluation and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Systematic Review. , 2015, JAMA.

[10]  Y. Adler,et al.  A randomized trial of colchicine for acute pericarditis. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  David H. Spodick,et al.  Acute Pericarditis: Diagnostic Cues and Common Electrocardiographic Manifestations , 2007, Cardiology in review.

[12]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis: A JACC White Paper , 2009 .