The effect of different build orientations on the consolidation, tensile and fracture toughness properties of direct metal laser sintering Ti-6Al-4V

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study new process parameters which were selected to achieve the full density of Ti-6Al-4V samples in different building orientations and investigate fracture toughness property and its relation to the microstructure, an area which has not previously been reported in full detail and which may offer information to a designer. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) is an additive manufacturing technique that directly manufactures three-dimensional parts, layer-by-layer, to scan and melt metal powders for aerospace applications. Design/methodology/approach Hardness and tensile tests were carried out to evaluate the effect of consolidation on the mechanical performance of specimens made at three different building directions. Optical and electron microscopy were used to characterise the microstructure of the DMLS specimens and their effects on the fractures and mechanical properties. Findings It was found that the built samples have an excellent density at 4.5 g/cm, and the sample surfaces parallel to the building direction are rougher than the perpendicular surfaces. The fracture toughness result was higher than that of the cast material for the same alloy and higher than the Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by electron beam melting. This results in the superior mechanical properties of DMLS, while slightly lower in the zy direction owing to cracks, porosity and surface finish. Research limitations/implications The tensile strength was found to be higher than the wrought material, and the samples exhibited brittle fractures owing to the martensitic phase, which is caused by a high temperature gradient, and the mechanical properties change with the change in the microstructures at different building directions. Originality/value This paper contains original research.

[1]  I. Polmear,et al.  Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals , 2006 .

[2]  E. Chlebus,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Ti―6Al―7Nb alloy produced by selective laser melting , 2011 .

[3]  J. Kruth,et al.  A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V , 2010 .

[4]  Chia-Chieh Shen,et al.  Corrosion behavior of thermohydrogen processed Ti6Al4V , 2007 .

[5]  A. M. Irisarri,et al.  Electron beam welded high thickness Ti6Al4V plates using filler metal of similar and different composition to the base plate , 2001 .

[6]  Mamidala Ramulu,et al.  Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Components: Properties and Performance , 2013 .

[7]  C. Tuck,et al.  Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V , 2014 .

[8]  M. Ramulu,et al.  Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V , 2014 .

[9]  F. Klocke,et al.  Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing , 2007 .

[10]  J. Kruth,et al.  Manufacturing by combining Selective Laser Melting and Selective Laser Erosion/laser re-melting , 2011 .

[11]  Sara M. Gaytan,et al.  Evaluation of Titanium Alloys Fabricated Using Rapid Prototyping Technologies—Electron Beam Melting and Laser Beam Melting , 2011, Materials.

[12]  T. L. Yang,et al.  Anisotropic response of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by 3D printing selective laser melting , 2017 .

[13]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  The laser additive manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V , 2001 .

[14]  Chandrika Kamath,et al.  Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[15]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  Fabrication of Metal and Alloy Components by Additive Manufacturing: Examples of 3D Materials Science , 2012 .

[16]  M. Lima,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical behavior of laser additive manufactured AISI 316 stainless steel stringers , 2014 .

[17]  John J. Lewandowski,et al.  Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing , 2016 .

[18]  L. Murr,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Jyoti Mazumder,et al.  Evolution of microstructure in laser deposited Al-11.28%Si alloy , 2012 .

[20]  Christoph Leyens,et al.  Titanium Alloys for Aerospace Applications , 2003 .

[21]  Horst Meier,et al.  Experimental studies on selective laser melting of metallic parts , 2008 .

[22]  L. Chauke,et al.  Characterization of the direct metal laser sintered Ti6Al4V Components , 2013 .

[23]  Feng Lin,et al.  Scanning method of filling lines in electron beam selective melting , 2007 .

[24]  Carolin Körner,et al.  Fundamental consolidation mechanisms during selective beam melting of powders , 2013 .

[25]  Yusheng Shi,et al.  316L Stainless Steel with Gradient Porosity Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting , 2010 .

[26]  Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by Selective Laser Melting: Microstructure and mechanical properties , 2012 .

[27]  Bo Song,et al.  Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V , 2012 .

[28]  G. K. Lewis,et al.  Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition , 2000 .

[29]  Brent Stucker,et al.  Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes , 2014 .

[30]  H. Maier,et al.  On the mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: Fatigue resistance and crack growth performance , 2013 .