Different paths to economic reform in Russia and China: causes and consequences

Economic reform in Russia has been described as 'shock therapy' because rapid industrial privatization, price liberalization and democratic reforms of the political system were introduced simultaneously. However, shock therapy led to insider control of most manufacturing firms, with important consequences for foreign investment. In contrast, China's 'gradualist' reforms, without privatization or significant democratization, facilitated foreign joint ventures as the dominant means of reforming State-owned enterprises incrementally. This paper proposes an explanation for these contrasting reform paths in Russia and China and then traces their consequences for inward foreign domestic investment (FDI), exporting and for corporate governance in the short and long term. The impact of national level policies on enterprises is demonstrated in a matched pair of cases in Russia and China. Conclusions are drawn for policy, for practice and for future research.

[1]  Wing Thye Woo,et al.  Structural factors in the economic reforms of China, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union , 1994 .

[2]  M. Wright,et al.  Revitalizing privatized Russian enterprises , 1998 .

[3]  T. Buck.  Agents, Stakeholders and Corporate Governance in Russian Firms , 1998 .

[4]  Joseph R. Blasi,et al.  Kremlin Capitalism: Privatizing the Russian Economy , 1996 .

[5]  Gregory E. Osland,et al.  Performance Issues in U.S.—China Joint Ventures , 1996 .

[6]  O. Andersen.  On the Internationalization Process of Firms: A Critical Analysis , 1993 .

[7]  Saul Estrin,et al.  Employee ownership in transition , 1995 .

[8]  James R. Mann.  Beijing Jeep: The Short, Unhappy Romance of American Business in China , 1989 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  John Child,et al.  The Iron Law of Fiefs: Bureaucratic Failure and the Problem of Governance in the Chinese Economic Reforms , 1988 .

[11]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The Characteristics of Joint Ventures in the People's Republic of China , 1993 .

[12]  J. Sachs,et al.  Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration , 1995 .

[13]  Igor H.Ansoff.  Strategic Management , 1979 .

[14]  S. Shane.  THE EFFECT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE CHOICE BETWEEN LICENSING AND DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT , 1994 .

[15]  Igor Filatotchev,et al.  Downsizing in Privatized Firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus , 2000 .

[16]  M. Wright,et al.  Corporate Governance in the Former Soviet Union , 1999 .

[17]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  The Export Development Process: An Integrative Review of Empirical Models , 1996 .

[18]  Mike Wright,et al.  Corporate Governance in the Former Soviet Union: An Overview , 1999 .

[19]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  The Nature of the International Firm , 1998 .

[20]  K. Sauvant.  World Investment Report , 1999 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[22]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Business strategies in transition economies , 2001 .

[23]  M. Warner.  Management-labour relations in the new Chinese economy , 1997 .

[24]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[25]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  The Role of Key Stakeholders in the International Joint Venture Negotiations: Case Studies from Eastern Europe , 1997 .

[26]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions , 1986 .

[27]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Strategic investment flexibility for MNE success in Russia: Evolving beyond entry modes , 1997 .

[28]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[29]  J. Sachs,et al.  Economic Reform and the Progress of Global Integration , 1995 .

[30]  Mike Wright,et al.  Corporate Restructuring in Russian Privatizations: Implications for U.S. Investors , 1996 .

[31]  C. Gaddy,et al.  Russia's Virtual Economy , 2002 .

[32]  P. Aiello.  Building a Joint Venture in China: The Case of Chrysler and the Beijing Jeep Corporation , 1991 .

[33]  J. Maquet.  EBRD (EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT) UPDATED TRANSPORT OPERATIONS POLICY , 1997 .