Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jacob Geleijns | Bart J A Mertens | Wouter J H Veldkamp | W. Veldkamp | B. Mertens | J. Geleijns | L. Kroft | Lucia J M Kroft | Jan Pieter A van Delft | Jan-Pieter van Delft
[1] E Samei,et al. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.
[2] Ehsan Samei,et al. Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. , 2003, Radiology.
[3] Anders Tingberg,et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[4] C. Engelke,et al. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 2005, Radiology.
[5] Y. van der Graaf,et al. Effect of Dose Levels on the Diagnostic Performance of a Selenium-Based Digital Chest System , 2001, Investigative radiology.
[6] Markus Völk,et al. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[7] K. Ludwig,et al. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography. , 1999, Radiology.
[8] H. Jäger,et al. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[9] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[10] Y. van der Graaf,et al. Effects of dose reduction on digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: a study of detecting simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] M. Völk,et al. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon. , 1998, Investigative radiology.
[12] Ehsan Samei,et al. Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. , 2004, Medical physics.
[13] U Neitzel,et al. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. , 1996, Radiology.
[14] C. Fink,et al. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[15] Hagen Schmidl,et al. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings. , 2003, Radiology.
[16] W. Veldkamp,et al. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[17] Albert de Roos,et al. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. , 2004, Radiology.
[18] Peter Smeets,et al. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[19] Boris Radeleff,et al. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[20] Anders Tingberg,et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[21] W. Veldkamp,et al. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study. , 2005, Radiology.