PERC+: industrial PERC solar cells with rear Al grid enabling bifaciality and reduced Al paste consumption

Passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells are currently being introduced into mass production. In this paper, we report a novel PERC solar cell design that applies a screen-printed rear Al finger grid instead of the conventional full-area aluminum (Al) rear layer while using the same PERC manufacturing sequence. We name this novel cell concept PERC+ because it offers several advantages. In particular, the Al paste consumption of the PERC+ cells is drastically reduced to 0.15 g instead of 1.6 g for the conventional PERC cells. The Al fingers create 2-µm-deeper aluminum back surface fields, which increases the open-circuit voltage by 4 mV. The five-busbar Al finger grid enables bifacial applications of the PERC+ cells with front-side efficiencies up to 20.8% and rear-side efficiencies up to 16.5% measured with a black chuck. The corresponding bifaciality is 79%. When applied in monofacial modules where the white back sheet acts as external rear reflector, the efficiency of the PERC+ cells is estimated to 20.9%, which is comparable with conventional PERC cells. Whereas Institute for Solar Energy Research Hamelin developed the aforementioned PERC+ results, SolarWorld independently pioneered a very similar bifacial PERC+ cell process starting in 2014. Transfer into mass production has been successfully accomplished, and novel glass–glass bifacial PERC+ modules have been launched at the Intersolar 2015 based on a most simple, lean, and cost-effective bifacial cell process. These new bifacial PERC+ modules show an increase in annual energy yield between 5% and 25% in simulations, which is confirmed by first outdoor measurements. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Marius Peters,et al.  Vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic modules: A global analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Haijiao An,et al.  Progress in n-type Si solar cell and module technology for high efficiency and low cost , 2012, 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[3]  Christopher Kranz,et al.  Wet Chemical Polishing for Industrial Type PERC Solar Cells , 2013 .

[4]  K. Bothe,et al.  Modeling the formation of local highly aluminum‐doped silicon regions by rapid thermal annealing of screen‐printed aluminum , 2012 .

[5]  Bas B. Van Aken,et al.  Outdoor Performance of Bifacial Modules by Measurements and Modelling , 2015 .

[6]  M. Green,et al.  22.8% efficient silicon solar cell , 1989 .

[7]  R. Brendel,et al.  21.2%‐efficient fineline‐printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid , 2014 .

[8]  K. Bothe,et al.  Fine-Line Printed 5 Busbar PERC Solar Cells with Conversion Efficiencies Beyond 21% , 2014 .

[9]  Thomas Roth,et al.  Model Based Continuous Improvement of Industrial p-type PERC Technology Beyond 21% Efficiency , 2015 .

[10]  Jens Müller,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the bulk and rear recombination of screen-printed PERC solar cells , 2012 .

[11]  B. Fröhlich,et al.  Diffusion‐based model of local Al back surface field formation for industrial passivated emitter and rear cell solar cells , 2015 .

[12]  P. Altermatt,et al.  Silicon wafer material options for highly efficient p-type PERC solar cells , 2013, 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[13]  Jenny Lam,et al.  Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems Energy Yield Modelling , 2015 .

[14]  M. Taguchi,et al.  24.7% Record Efficiency HIT Solar Cell on Thin Silicon Wafer , 2013, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[15]  Gunnar Schubert,et al.  Silicon diffusion in aluminum for rear passivated solar cells , 2011 .

[16]  Jürgen H. Werner,et al.  Quantum efficiency analysis of thin-layer silicon solar cells with back surface fields and optical confinement , 1996 .