Analysis of Some Modified Cell-Averaging CFAR Processors in Multiple-Target Situations

A serious degradation of detection probability (Pd) in a cellaverging constant false alarm rate (CA-CFAR) detector is known to be caused by the presence of an interfering target in the set of reference cells. A technique which is often used to prevent excessive false alarms at clutter ¿edges¿ is a ¿greatest of¿ (GO) selection between the leading and lagging sets of cells (GO-CFAR). However, it is demonstrated for a Rayleigh target that the abovementioned suppression effect is more acute in the GO-CFAR. Practically, detection of closely separated targets is almost inhibited. Selection of the ¿smallest of¿ (SO) the means for the adaptive threshold has been proposed to alleviate this problem. An analytic expression for Pd of this detector is also derived, and it is shown that though it does prevent the suppression effect, a large sensitivity loss is introduced unless the number of reference cells is sufficiently large. A modified CO-CFAR detector, combining a ¿censoring¿ circuit, is proposed for automatic detection in a complex nonhomogeneous environment.

[1]  V. Gregers Hansen,et al.  Detection Performance of the Cell Averaging LOG/CFAR Receiver , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  F. D. Queen,et al.  Modified Generalized Sign Test Processor for 2-D Radar , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Johanna Moore,et al.  Comparison of two CFAR methods used with square law detection of Swerling I targets , 1980 .

[4]  John Rickard,et al.  Adaptive Detection Algorithms for Multiple-Target Situations , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  V. G. Hansen,et al.  Constant false alarm rate processing in search radars , 1973 .

[6]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Signal detection in Gaussian noise of unknown level: An invariance application , 1971, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  R. Nitzberg.  Analysis of the Arithmetic Mean CFAR Normalizer for Fluctuating Targets , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Recursive Methods for Computing Detection Probabilities , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  B. O. Steenson,et al.  Detection Performance of a Mean-Level Threshold , 1968, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  V. Hansen,et al.  Detectability Loss Due to "Greatest Of" Selection in a Cell-Averaging CFAR , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  George M. Dillard,et al.  Mean-Level Detection of Nonfluctuating Signals , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  G. Trunk.  Range Resolution of Targets Using Automatic Detectors , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[13]  H. M. Finn,et al.  Adaptive detection mode with threshold control as a function of spatially sampled clutter level estimates , 1968 .