At the frontiers of scientific advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators

This paper aims to unearth the factors that influence scientists in becoming and choosing to become publicly funded principal investigators (PIs). PIs are the linchpins of knowledge transformation and bridging triple helix actors, particularly academia-industry. At a micro level, PIs are at the nexus of engaging and interacting with other triple helix actors. No study to date has specifically focused on the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded PIs. For scientists taking on the role of a PI represents an important landmark in their research career. Set in an Irish research system we found two main categories of influencing factors—push and pull. Pull factors are where the PI has more choice in choosing to become a PI, where as push factors is where the PI has less choice in choosing to become a PI. Pull factors we identified were control, career ambition and advancement, personal drive and ambition. Pull factors we identified were project dependencies and institutional pressures.

[1]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research , 2014 .

[2]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[3]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Closing the distance between academia and market: experimentation and user entrepreneurial processes , 2014 .

[4]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[5]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[6]  Devrim Göktepe-Hultén,et al.  Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation? , 2010 .

[7]  R. Keller,et al.  Job involvement and organizational commitment as longitudinal predictors of job performance: A study of scientists and engineers. , 1997 .

[8]  Donna K. Kidwell,et al.  Navigating the role of the principal investigator: a comparison of four cases , 2014 .

[9]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science , 2005 .

[10]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[11]  P. S. Vincett The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy , 2010 .

[12]  Peter Smith Ring,et al.  Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints , 1985 .

[13]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .

[14]  C. Antonelli,et al.  The cliometrics of academic chairs. Scientific knowledge and economic growth: the evidence across the Italian Regions 1900–1959 , 2013 .

[15]  O. Jones Human Resources, Scientists, and Internal Reputation: The Role of Climate and Job Satisfaction , 1996 .

[16]  Grant Harman,et al.  Australian university research commercialisation: perceptions of technology transfer specialists and science and technology academics , 2010 .

[17]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .

[18]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry , 2007 .

[19]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Editor's introduction: building and deploying scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[20]  G. Rausser Private/Public Research: Knowledge Assets and Future Scenarios , 1999 .

[21]  Patricia H. Thornton THE SOCIOLOGY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 1999 .

[22]  Michel Callon,et al.  Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993 , 1994 .

[23]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[24]  M. Weber Science as a Vocation , 1919 .

[25]  Irwin Feller Technology Transfer from Universities , 1996 .

[26]  Fred Pries,et al.  Commercial Exploitation of New Technologies Arising from University Research: Start-Ups and Markets for Technology , 2007 .

[27]  John A. Worthley,et al.  A Perspective on the Challenge of Public Management: Environmental Paradox and Organizational Culture , 1981 .

[28]  E. A. Locke,et al.  The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Stéphane Malo,et al.  The contribution of (not so) public research to commercial innovations in the field of combinatorial chemistry , 2009 .

[30]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[31]  D. Farmer Strategies for Change. , 1990 .

[32]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[33]  D. B. Miller Managing professionals in research and development , 1986 .

[34]  B. Godin The Linear Model of Innovation , 2006 .

[35]  Donna K. Kidwell,et al.  Principal investigators as knowledge brokers: A multiple case study of the creative actions of PIs in entrepreneurial science , 2013 .

[36]  L. Vaccarezza The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[37]  N. Foss,et al.  Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation , 2013 .

[38]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Social Program Implementation. , 1977 .

[39]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[40]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[41]  L. Nesta,et al.  What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb , 1999 .

[42]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[43]  Robert W. Backoff,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations , 1976 .

[44]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[45]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .

[46]  Judith Bell,et al.  教育与社科研究入门指南(第三版) = Doing Your Research Project , 1999 .

[47]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[48]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[49]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation , 1996 .

[50]  J. Barney,et al.  What Are Microfoundations? , 2013 .

[51]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers , 2014 .

[52]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  The Case Study Anthology , 2004 .

[53]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[54]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[55]  H. Etzkowitz Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[56]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Life Sciences Faculty , 2001 .

[57]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Underpinning Strategic Behaviours and Posture of Principal Investigators In Transition/Uncertain Environments , 2015 .

[59]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[60]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  PhD job market: professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD , 2000 .

[61]  M. Weber From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[62]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  The roles of science in technological innovation , 1993 .

[63]  S. Winter Habit, Deliberation, and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities , 2013 .

[64]  L. Leydesdorff The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[65]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[66]  Corine Genet,et al.  Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs , 2014 .

[67]  Werner Bönte,et al.  Spillovers from publicly financed business R&D: some empirical evidence from Germany , 2004 .

[68]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[69]  H. Etzkowitz Networks of Innovation: Science, Technology and Development in the Triple Helix Era , 2002 .