The Effects of Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Peer Review on EFL Writers' Comments and Revisions.

This study investigates the use of face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing course to examine how different interaction modes affect comment categories, students’ revisions, and their perceptions of peer feedback. The participants were an intact class of 13 students at a Taiwanese university. The computer-mediated peer review involved OnlineMeeting , software specifically designed for peer review activities and featuring a split screen protocol, document sharing, and chat room functions. The results of chi-square tests show that overall students offered more revision-oriented comments than non-revision-oriented ones among different writing tasks in either mode. Also, peer review mode affected some types of peer comments to a certain extent. There were significantly more global alteration comments and fewer local alteration comments in face-to-face than computer-mediated mode. While the participants liked comments via Word ’s annotation features over handwritten comments, they felt face-to-face discussions to be more effective than online chat via OnlineMeeting due to the affordance of face-to-face talk (e.g., immediacy and paralinguistic features), that cannot be easily replaced by electronic chat. Pedagogical implications regarding the balanced use of computer-mediated and non-computer-mediated writing activities are discussed, along with suggestions for future research.

[1]  L. Honeycutt.  Comparing E-Mail and Synchronous Conferencing in Online Peer Response , 2001 .

[2]  W. Grabe,et al.  Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective , 1998 .

[3]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Electronic feedback and second language writing , 2006 .

[4]  George Braine,et al.  A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes , 2001 .

[5]  Moving multimodality beyond the binaries: A response to Gunther Kress' "Gains and Losses" , 2005 .

[6]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction , 1996 .

[7]  Ching-Fen Chang,et al.  Peer Review via Three Modes in an EFL Writing Course , 2012 .

[8]  Mei-Ya Liang,et al.  USING SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE PEER RESPONSE GROUPS IN EFL WRITING: REVISION-RELATED DISCOURSE , 2010 .

[9]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Peter Twining.  'Learning matters' - adjusting the media mix for academic advantage , 1999 .

[11]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers , 2006 .

[12]  王美蓉.  A Study on Online Peer Feedback , 2004 .

[13]  Frank Tuzi,et al.  The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course , 2004 .

[14]  Richard Badger,et al.  A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class , 2006 .

[15]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality , 2006 .

[16]  Beth L. Hewett,et al.  Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision , 2000 .

[17]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[18]  Elaine DiGiovanni,et al.  Online Peer Review: An Alternative to Face-to-Face? , 2001 .

[19]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Author index , 2006 .

[20]  Martin Guardado,et al.  ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback , 2007 .

[21]  Hsien-Chin Liou,et al.  Training Effects on Computer-Mediated Peer Review. , 2009 .

[22]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen , 1995 .

[23]  Mohammad Reza Moradi,et al.  The Effect of Online Peer Feedback on the Academic Writing Ability of Iranian EFL Learners , 2012 .

[25]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing , 2006, Feedback in Second Language Writing.

[26]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training , 2008 .

[27]  Siriluck Usaha,et al.  HOW EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS USE ELECTRONIC PEER RESPONSE INTO REVISIONS , 2009 .

[28]  Lee-Ann K Breuch.  Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Online Environments , 2004 .

[29]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .

[30]  Sandra J. Savignon,et al.  Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Peer Review in EFL Writing , 2013 .