Strong Convergence of Euler-Type Methods for Nonlinear Stochastic Differential Equations

Traditional finite-time convergence theory for numerical methods applied to stochastic differential equations (SDEs) requires a global Lipschitz assumption on the drift and diffusion coefficients. In practice, many important SDE models satisfy only a local Lipschitz property and, since Brownian paths can make arbitrarily large excursions, the global Lipschitz-based theory is not directly relevant. In this work we prove strong convergence results under less restrictive conditions. First, we give a convergence result for Euler--Maruyama requiring only that the SDE is locally Lipschitz and that the pth moments of the exact and numerical solution are bounded for some p >2. As an application of this general theory we show that an implicit variant of Euler--Maruyama converges if the diffusion coefficient is globally Lipschitz, but the drift coefficient satisfies only a one-sided Lipschitz condition; this is achieved by showing that the implicit method has bounded moments and may be viewed as an Euler--Maruyama approximation to a perturbed SDE of the same form. Second, we show that the optimal rate of convergence can be recovered if the drift coefficient is also assumed to behave like a polynomial.

[1]  Stability , 1973 .

[2]  I. Gyöngy A note on Euler's Approximations , 1998 .

[3]  X. Mao Stability of Stochastic Differential Equations With Respect to Semimartingales , 1991 .

[4]  H. Schurz Stability, stationarity, and boundedness of some implicit numerical methods for stochastic differential equations and applications , 1997 .

[5]  G. Dahlquist Error analysis for a class of methods for stiff non-linear initial value problems , 1976 .

[6]  I. Gyöngy,et al.  Existence of strong solutions for Itô's stochastic equations via approximations , 1996, Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations.

[7]  K. Burrage,et al.  Stability Criteria for Implicit Runge–Kutta Methods , 1979 .

[8]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1992 .

[9]  J. Verwer,et al.  Stability of Runge-Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differential Equations , 1984 .

[10]  A. R. Humphries,et al.  Dynamical Systems And Numerical Analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Pierre Bernard,et al.  Convergence of Numerical Schemes for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2001, Monte Carlo Methods Appl..

[12]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[13]  Yaozhong Hu Semi-Implicit Euler-Maruyama Scheme for Stiff Stochastic Equations , 1996 .

[14]  John C. Butcher,et al.  A stability property of implicit Runge-Kutta methods , 1975 .

[15]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise , 2002 .

[16]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I , 1987 .

[17]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  A note on the stability properties of the Euler methods for solving stochastic differential equations , 2000 .

[18]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Mean-Square and Asymptotic Stability of the Stochastic Theta Method , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  István Gyöngy,et al.  A Note on Euler's Approximations , 1998, Potential Analysis.