Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) requires the existence of an efficient information selection mechanism. While it has been shown that under low VWM load, an irrelevant simple feature can be processed, its fate under high load (e.g., six objects) remains unclear. We explored this issue by probing the “irrelevant-change distracting effect,” in which the change of a stored irrelevant feature affects performance. Simple colored shapes were used as stimuli, with color as the target. Using a whole-probe method (presenting six objects in both the memory and test arrays), in Experiment 1 we found that a change to one of the six shapes led to a significant distracting effect. Using a partial-probe method (presenting the probe either at the screen center or at a location selected from the memory array), in Experiment 2 we showed the distracting effect again. These results suggest that irrelevant simple features can be stored into VWM, regardless of memory load.

[1]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[2]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  The Neural Fate of Task-Irrelevant Features in Object-Based Processing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  What Does Ipsilateral Delay Activity Reflect? Inferences from Slow Potentials in a Lateralized Visual Working Memory Task , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[7]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Liqiang Huang,et al.  Visual working memory is better characterized as a distributed resource rather than discrete slots. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  G. Woodman,et al.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  A. Hollingworth Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Visual memory for features, conjunctions, objects, and locations , 2008 .

[12]  Mowei Shen,et al.  Dissociated Mechanisms of Extracting Perceptual Information into Visual Working Memory , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Attention Protects the Fidelity of Visual Memory: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Woodman,et al.  Selective storage and maintenance of an object’s features in visual working memory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  M. Chun,et al.  Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  E. Vogel,et al.  Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Mowei Shen,et al.  Visual Working Memory Capacity Does Not Modulate the Feature-Based Information Filtering in Visual Working Memory , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[23]  G. Alvarez Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The Processing of Visual Shape in the Cerebral Cortex of Human and Nonhuman Primates: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Katherine Roe,et al.  Selective involvement of superior frontal cortex during working memory for shapes. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  The Visual World in Memory , 2008 .