The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat– and bird–fruit networks

In networks of plant–animal mutualisms, different animal groups interact preferentially with different plants, thus forming distinct modules responsible for different parts of the service. However, what we currently know about seed dispersal networks is based only on birds. Therefore, we wished to fill this gap by studying bat–fruit networks and testing how they differ from bird–fruit networks. As dietary overlap of Neotropical bats and birds is low, they should form distinct mutualistic modules within local networks. Furthermore, since frugivory evolved only once among Neotropical bats, but several times independently among Neotropical birds, greater dietary overlap is expected among bats, and thus connectance and nestedness should be higher in bat–fruit networks. If bat–fruit networks have higher nestedness and connectance, they should be more robust to extinctions. We analyzed 1 mixed network of both bats and birds and 20 networks that consisted exclusively of either bats (11) or birds (9). As expected, the structure of the mixed network was both modular (M = 0.45) and nested (NODF = 0.31); one module contained only birds and two only bats. In 20 datasets with only one disperser group, bat–fruit networks (NODF = 0.53 ± 0.09, C = 0.30 ± 0.11) were more nested and had a higher connectance than bird–fruit networks (NODF = 0.42 ± 0.07, C = 0.22 ± 0.09). Unexpectedly, robustness to extinction of animal species was higher in bird–fruit networks (R = 0.60 ± 0.13) than in bat–fruit networks (R = 0.54 ± 0.09), and differences were explained mainly by species richness. These findings suggest that a modular structure also occurs in seed dispersal networks, similar to pollination networks. The higher nestedness and connectance observed in bat–fruit networks compared with bird–fruit networks may be explained by the monophyletic evolution of frugivory in Neotropical bats, among which the diets of specialists seem to have evolved from the pool of fruits consumed by generalists.

[1]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[2]  Sitabhra Sinha,et al.  Examining the effects of species richness on community stability: an assembly model approach , 2002 .

[3]  A. C. Alexandrino,et al.  REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOLOGIA , 1987 .

[4]  E. Kalko,et al.  Trophic structure in a large assemblage of phyllostomid bats in Panama , 2004 .

[5]  M. C. D. Carvalho,et al.  Frugivoria por morcegos em floresta estacional semidecídua: dieta, riqueza de espécies e germinação de sementes após passagem pelo sistema digestivo , 2008 .

[6]  Bethany S. Dohleman Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .

[7]  D. W. Snow,et al.  The Feeding Ecology of Tanagers and Honeycreepers in Trinidad , 1971 .

[8]  M. Galetti,et al.  Fruit eating by birds in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. , 2013 .

[9]  A. E. Sorensen Interactions between birds and fruit in a temperate woodland , 1981, Oecologia.

[10]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[12]  D. Gorchov,et al.  Dietary overlap between frugivorous birds and bats in the Peruvian Amazon , 1995 .

[13]  Wagner André Pedro,et al.  Estrutura de uma taxocenose de morcegos da reserva do Panga (Uberlandia, MG), com enfase nas relações troficas em Phyllostomidae (Mammalia: Chiroptera) , 1992 .

[14]  D. Levey,et al.  WHY ARE SOME FRUITS TOXIC? GLYCOALKALOIDS IN SOLANUMAND FRUIT CHOICE BY VERTEBRATES , 1997 .

[15]  M. Galetti,et al.  Why are fruits colorful? The relative importance of achromatic and chromatic contrasts for detection by birds , 2009, Evolutionary Ecology.

[16]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[18]  M. Groom,et al.  Avian fruit preferences across a Puerto Rican forested landscape: pattern consistency and implications for seed removal , 2002, Oecologia.

[19]  J. Terborgh,et al.  1 Maintenance of Tree Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[20]  Q. Garcia,et al.  Seed dispersal by bats in a disturbed area of Southeastern Brazil , 2000 .

[21]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[23]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[24]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[25]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[27]  R. B. Root The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher , 1967 .

[28]  O. von Helversen,et al.  Evolution of nectarivory in phyllostomid bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia) , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[29]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Seed dispersal and frugivory : ecology, evolution, and conservation , 2002 .

[30]  Theodore H. Fleming,et al.  Effects of Nectarivorous and Frugivorous Mammals on Reproductive Success of Plants , 1994 .

[31]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[32]  Robert Muscarella,et al.  The Role of Frugivorous Bats in Tropical Forest Succession , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[33]  Henry Howe,et al.  Ecology of Seed Dispersal , 1982 .

[34]  R. Chazdon,et al.  Small Tent‐Roosting Bats Promote Dispersal of Large‐Seeded Plants in a Neotropical Forest , 2009 .

[35]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[36]  Kathleen H. Keeler,et al.  The Ecology of Mutualism , 1982 .

[37]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early-warning signals for critical transitions , 2009, Nature.

[38]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[39]  D. Levey,et al.  ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF SOLANUM FRUIT GLYCOALKALOIDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FRUGIVORY AND SEED DISPERSAL , 1997 .

[40]  T. Oliver,et al.  Macroevolutionary patterns in the origin of mutualisms involving ants , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[41]  A. Peracchi,et al.  FIG-SEED PREDATION BY 2 SPECIES OF CHIRODERMA: DISCOVERY OF A NEW FEEDING STRATEGY IN BATS , 2003 .

[42]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Redes complejas de interacciones planta-animal , 2009 .

[43]  E. Kalko,et al.  Fruit characteristics and factors affecting fruit removal in a Panamanian community of strangler figs , 2000, Oecologia.

[44]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[45]  T. Fleming,et al.  Patterns of Tropical Vertebrate Frugivore Diversity , 1987 .

[46]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Disentangling the Web of Life , 2009, Science.

[47]  E. Kalko,et al.  Phenology of neotropical pepper plants (Piperaceae) and their association with their main dispersers, two short‐tailed fruit bats, Carollia perspicillata and C. castanea (Phyllostomidae) , 2004 .

[48]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Specialization, Constraints, and Conflicting Interests in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[49]  Nathaniel T. Wheelwright,et al.  Tropical fruit-eating birds and their food plants: a survey of a Costa Rican lower montane forest. , 1984 .

[50]  B. Snow,et al.  Birds and Berries , 1990 .

[51]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  Interaction Intimacy Affects Structure and Coevolutionary Dynamics in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[52]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global distribution of frugivory in birds , 2009 .

[53]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles , 2005, Journal of statistical mechanics.

[54]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[55]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[57]  J. R. Runkle,et al.  Nutritional Values of 14 Fig Species and Bat Feeding Preferences in Panama 1 , 2000 .

[58]  S. Mori,et al.  Seed Dispersal by Bats in the Neotropics , 2009 .

[59]  H. McAllister,et al.  Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[60]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[61]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community , 1996 .

[62]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[63]  P. Racey Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats , 2011 .

[64]  Wagner André Pedro,et al.  Frugivoria em morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) no Parque Estadual Intervales, sudeste do Brasil , 2003 .

[65]  J. Blondel Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? , 2003 .

[66]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Food niche overlap among neotropical frugivorous bats in Costa Rica. , 2003, Revista de biologia tropical.

[67]  S. Guevara,et al.  Bat‐ and Bird‐Generated Seed Rains at Isolated Trees in Pastures in a Tropical Rainforest , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[68]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP , 2006, BMC Ecology.