Dynamic Simulation and Optimum Operation Strategy of a Trigeneration System Serving a Hospital

This paper presents a numerical analysis of a trigeneration system in a hospital, aiming at determining the cost-optimal operating strategy as a function of the energy demands to be matched. The system includes: A natural gas fired reciprocating engine, heat exchangers for waste-heat recovery, a single-stage LiBr-H2O Absorption Chiller (ACH), a cooling tower, pumps, a backup boiler, a backup vapour-compression electric chiller, storage tanks, valves, mixers. For such system, a dynamic simulation model was developed in TRNSYS environment; the model includes detailed algorithms for all the components of the system. A case study was developed, referred to a hospital application, in which a Combined Heat, Cooling and Power (CHCP) system provides electricity, thermal and cooling energy. The electric energy demand was obtained by using real measured data and calibrating hospital literature data, whereas the demand for heating and cooling was estimated by means of a detailed simulation model. A detailed economic analysis was also included in the model, aiming at investigating the optimal control strategy needed to maximize the overall thermo economic performance of the system. To this scope, different control strategies were analysed. The most conventional operating strategy, Thermal Load Tracking mode (TLT), was compared with two alternative strategies: The Maximum Power Thermal Load Tracking mode (MPTLT) and the Electricity Load Tracking mode (ELT). MPTLT is a strategy featured by a thermal load tracking mode, but the engine, differently from TLT one, operates always at maximum power. ELT is a strategy in which the power provided by the engine is always less or equal to the electrical demand. In the paper, the results of the case study are presented on different time bases (days, weeks, years). Such results show that the ELT control strategy can achieve a better profitability, with a simple pay-back period, SPB, equal to 4 years. The conventional strategy (TLT) is shown to be the worst from the economic point of view, but among the best as for energy saving potential.

[1]  D. B. Espirito Santo,et al.  Energy and exergy efficiency of a building internal combustion engine trigeneration system under two different operational strategies , 2012 .

[2]  G. Chicco,et al.  From cogeneration to trigeneration: profitable alternatives in a competitive market , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[3]  Francesco Calise,et al.  Parametric exergy analysis of a tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) stack through finite-volume model , 2009 .

[4]  G. Chicco,et al.  Planning aspects and performance indicators for small-scale trigeneration plants , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Future Power Systems.

[5]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[6]  Ligang Zheng,et al.  ASPEN simulation of cogeneration plants , 2003 .

[7]  Reinhard Radermacher,et al.  Thermoeconomic Simulation of 27 MW Campus Cooling Heating Power (CHP) Plant , 2004 .

[8]  Long Wei-ding,et al.  An optimal sizing method for cogeneration plants , 2006 .

[9]  Robert Weber,et al.  TRNSYS17: NEW FEATURES OF THE MULTIZONE BUILDING MODEL , 2009 .

[10]  Farouk Fardoun,et al.  Recovery Storage Tank Size: An Optimization Approach for Tri-generation Systems on Diesel Power Generators , 2015 .

[11]  Francesco Calise,et al.  A finite-volume model of a parabolic trough photovoltaic/thermal collector: Energetic and exergetic analyses , 2012 .

[12]  Roberto Gallea,et al.  Optimization of trigeneration systems by Mathematical Programming: Influence of plant scheme and boundary conditions , 2015 .

[13]  Zacharias B. Maroulis,et al.  Design of a combined heating, cooling and power system: Sizing, operation strategy selection and parametric analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Mehdi Aghaei Meybodi,et al.  Selecting the prime movers and nominal powers in combined heat and power systems , 2008 .