Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients.

The pain relief scale (PRS) is a method that measures the magnitude of change in pain intensity after treatment. The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between PRS and changes in pain determined by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS), to confirm the evidence supporting the use of PRS. Sixty patients with chronic spinal pain that had a VAS and NRS recorded during an initial examination were enrolled in the study. One week later, the patients received an epidural nerve block, then VAS, NRS, and PRS assessments were performed. Differences between VAS and NRS were compared to the PRS and scatter plots and correlation coefficient were generated. The differences and magnitude of decrease in the VAS and NRS raw data were converted to percentile values, and compared to the PRS. Both VAS and NRS values exhibited strong correlations (> 0.8) with PRS. Further, the differences between the VAS-PRS R (0.859) and NRS-PRS R (0.915) were statistically significant, (P = 0.0259). Compared to PRS, the VAS and NRS percentile scores exhibited higher correlation coefficients than scores based on the raw data differences. Furthermore, even when converted to a percentile, the NRS%-PRS R (0.968) was higher than the VAS%-PRS R (0.904), P = 0.0001. The results indicated that using the PRS together with NRS in pain assessment increased the objectivity of the assessment compared to using only VAS or NRS, and may have offset the limitations of VAS or NRS alone.

[1]  E. Ohnhaus,et al.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale , 1975, PAIN.

[2]  E C Huskisson,et al.  Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. , 1979, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Measurement of pain: Patient preference does not confound pain measurement , 1981, Pain.

[4]  Agreement between Horizontal and Vertical Visual Analogue Scales , 1986 .

[5]  Y. Lam,et al.  Evaluation of the use of visual analogue scale in chinese patients , 1986, Pain.

[6]  S. Braver,et al.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods , 1986, Pain.

[7]  Visual analogue scales: a source of error. , 1988, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  J. Carroll,et al.  The dimensions of pain: a multidimensional scaling comparison of cancer patients and healthy volunteers , 1989, Pain.

[9]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. , 1994, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[10]  M. Jensen,et al.  What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? , 1994, Pain.

[11]  M. Mccaffery,et al.  Pain ratings: the fifth vital sign. , 1997, The American journal of nursing.

[12]  Jesse A. Berlin,et al.  Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures , 2000, PAIN.

[13]  S. Summers.  Evidence-based practice part 2: reliability and validity of selected acute pain instruments. , 2001, Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses.

[14]  [Diagnosis and assessment of pain]. , 2001, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[15]  Augusto Caraceni,et al.  Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care. , 2002, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[16]  Nathaniel P. Katz,et al.  Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers , 2002, PAIN.

[17]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Use of a numerical rating scale as an answer modality in ankylosing spondylitis-specific questionnaires. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  How reliable are pain scores? A pilot study of 20 healthy volunteers. , 2003, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[19]  C. Hartrick,et al.  The Numeric Rating Scale for Clinical Pain Measurement: A Ratio Measure? , 2003, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[20]  The Development of a Korean Pain Assessment Card , 2003 .

[21]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for Use in Documenting the Outcomes of Patients With Noncancer Pain , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[22]  C. Chapman,et al.  Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED. , 2005, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[23]  B. Hoggart,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[24]  M. Hjermstad,et al.  Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus , 2008, Palliative medicine.

[25]  J. Berlin,et al.  A Comparison of Change in the 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale to a Pain Relief Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale in a Short-term Clinical Trial of Breakthrough Pain Intensity , 2010, Anesthesiology.