Book-to-Market across Firm Size, Exchange, and Seasonality: Is There an Effect?

Abstract Fama and French (1992) report that size and the book-to-market ratio capture the cross-sectional variation of average stock returns for the universe of NYSE, Amex, and Nasdaq securities. This paper, in providing an exhaustive exploration of book-to-market across the dimensions of firm size, exchange listing, and calendar seasonally, reports that Fama and French's empirical findings are driven by two features of the data: a January seasonal in the book-to-market effect, and exceptionally low returns on small, young, growth stocks. In the largest size quintile of all firms (accounting for 73% of the total market value of all publicly traded firms), book-to-market has no significant explanatory power on the cross-section of realized returns during the 1963–1995 period. Thus, book-to-market as such would have less importance to money managers than the literature would have led us to believe.

[1]  E. Fama,et al.  Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns , 1995 .

[2]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  Another Look at the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns , 1995 .

[3]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan , 1991 .

[4]  James L. Davis.  The Cross-Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre- Compustat Evidence , 1994 .

[5]  Tim Loughran,et al.  The New Issues Puzzle , 1995 .

[6]  J. Ritter.  The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[7]  Donald B. Keim,et al.  Earnings Yields, Market Values, and Stock Returns , 1989 .

[8]  L. Brooks,et al.  The January Anomaly: Effects of Low Share Price , 1992 .

[9]  Donald B. Keim.  SIZE-RELATED ANOMALIES AND STOCK RETURN SEASONALITY Further Empirical Evidence , 1983 .

[10]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[11]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Evaluating the performance of value versus glamour stocks The impact of selection bias , 1995 .

[12]  M. Blume,et al.  BIASES IN COMPUTED RETURNS An Application to the Size Effect , 1983 .

[13]  Donald B. Keim,et al.  Chapter 17 On the predictability of common stock returns: World-wide evidence , 1999, Finance.

[14]  B. Malkiel.  Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991 , 1995 .

[15]  Elroy Dimson,et al.  Stock market anomalies , 1989 .

[16]  Roger G. Ibbotson,et al.  THE MARKET'S PROBLEMS WITH THE PRICING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS , 1994 .

[17]  Jay R. Ritter,et al.  Portfolio Rebalancing and the Turn‐of‐the‐Year Effect , 1989 .

[18]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk , 1993 .

[19]  J. Siegel.  The Nifty-Fifty Revisited , 1995 .

[20]  E. A. Dyl,et al.  MARKET STRUCTURE AND REPORTED TRADING VOLUME: NASDAQ VERSUS THE NYSE , 1997 .

[21]  Tim Loughran,et al.  NYSE vs NASDAQ returns: Market microstructure or the poor performance of initial public offerings? , 1993 .

[22]  Donald B. Keim.  Trading patterns, bid-ask spreads, and estimated security returns: The case of common stocks at calendar turning points , 1989 .