An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options

In the last decade efforts have been carried out by the scientific community aimed at building integrated frameworks to support the decision-making process when sustainability issues are addressed. This paper proposes a further advancement in integrated assessment procedures by setting up an operational multi-scale and transparent framework, which comprises the assessment of European regions in terms of sustainability, and the identification of the impact that policy options might have on the sustainability of these regions. The framework is designed for use in ex ante sustainability impact assessment of policy scenarios on multifunctionality of land use and integrates economic, environmental and social issues across a variety of sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, tourism and energy). The proposed method provides a conceptual framework applicable at different scales (European, regional), and takes into account the great variability of European regions. The described methodology is based on linear additive models to weight and aggregate selected indicators to a set of land use functions identified to describe the goods and services provided by the different land uses that summarise the most relevant economic, environmental and social issues of a region. The framework is designed to allow the evaluation of impacts at an international scale (e.g. the European Union), or on selected regions. The aggregation framework can be used to evaluate the impact that policy options have on the sustainability of multifunctional land use systems with competing demands. A conceptual envelope, called the “trade-off evaluation space”, delineates all possible developments in the functions of the land. The sustainability limits identify the subset of ‘acceptable’ policy options within the trade-off evaluation space, so that the distance of each land use function from sustainability limits can be estimated and trade-offs between the different functions of the multifunctional land use system can be identified. The proposed methodology is adaptable to different contexts: if the assumption is taken that all land use functions are equally weighted the framework can be used to analyse policy cases and take decisions on policy options at the European or regional level. However, at the local-scale the framework can also be applied through a participatory approach and the distribution of weights can be rediscussed with local stakeholders. In both cases the proposed system can be used as a tool for discussion among all interested parties.

[1]  Caspar A. Mücher,et al.  A Spatial Regional Reference Framework for Sustainability Assessment in Europe , 2008 .

[2]  Joe Ravetz,et al.  Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions , 2000 .

[3]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand , 2000 .

[4]  Stephen J. Bonnell The cumulative environmental effects of proposed small-scale hydroelectric developments in Newfoundland, Canada , 1997 .

[5]  Brian W. Mar,et al.  The Delphi technique in environmental assessment. I: Implementation and effectiveness , 1985 .

[6]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[8]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions , 2005 .

[9]  Jürgen Vogt,et al.  Weighting and aggregation of indicators for sustainability impact assessment in the SENSOR context , 2008 .

[10]  H. Bossel Indicators for sustainable Development : theory, method, applications : a report to the Balaton Group , 1999 .

[11]  J. Vogt,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes , 2008 .

[12]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions — the SENSOR approach , 2008 .

[13]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Validation of multicriteria analysis models , 1999 .

[14]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  The Scene Model: Getting A Grip On Sustainable Development In Policy Making , 2005 .

[15]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessments: limits, thresholds and the Sustainability Choice Space , 2008 .

[16]  Paul Tabbush,et al.  Impact Assessment in the European Commission in relation to Multifunctional Land Use , 2008 .

[17]  Wim Moesen,et al.  Benchmarking the performance of nations: non‐uniform weighting and non‐economic dimensions , 2007 .

[18]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability , 2008 .

[19]  G. Van Huylenbroeck,et al.  Multicriteria Analysis of the Conflicts between Rural Development Scenarios in the Gordon District, Scotland , 1995 .

[20]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analyse , 1991 .

[21]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment quality assurance: evaluating and improving the consistency of judgments in assessment panels , 2004 .

[22]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Karlheinz Knickel,et al.  Multifunctionality in European agriculture , 2004 .

[24]  A. Gokhale,et al.  Environmental Initiative Prioritization with a Delphi Approach: A Case Study , 2001, Environmental management.

[25]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[26]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS IT? & WHAT MAKES IT STRATEGIC? , 2000 .

[27]  Floor Brouwer,et al.  Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment; governance, policy and multifunctionality , 2004 .