Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness

This investigation tested a theoretical model of communication behavior with specific Facebook friends, such that attitudes toward (a) online self-disclosure, and (b) online social connection, predict Facebook communication frequency and, in turn, relational closeness. Participants included both undergraduates and older adults. Results generally supported the model, with the interaction effect between self-disclosure and social connection directly predicting Facebook communication and indirectly predicting relational closeness. For both dependent variables, online social connection was a positive predictor at low and moderate levels of online self-disclosure, but high levels reduced the association to nonsignificance. One implication of these results was that high-warrant information may discourage those with social anxiety from social network site communication.

[1]  W. K. Rawlins,et al.  Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics, and the Life Course , 1992 .

[2]  R. Dodhia.  A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[3]  C. Fischer,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1993 .

[4]  Jake Harwood,et al.  Shared Family Identity, Age Salience, and Intergroup Contact: Investigation of the Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship , 2006 .

[5]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[6]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Personal Relationships and Personal Networks , 2007 .

[7]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace , 2007 .

[8]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation With Contextual Factors , 2007 .

[9]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  A Test of Warranting Theory Using Facebook , 2009 .

[10]  Shirley S. Ho,et al.  Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, Commun. Res..

[11]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[12]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[13]  M. Villagran,et al.  Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends , 2003 .

[14]  Scott E. Caplan.  A Theory of Problematic Internet Use and Psychosocial Well-Being , 2003 .

[15]  Andrew M. Ledbetter.  Family Communication Patterns and Relational Maintenance Behavior: Direct and Mediated Associations with Friendship Closeness , 2009 .

[16]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Will You (Still) Be My Friend? Computer-Mediated Relational Maintenance on Facebook.com , 2008 .

[17]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[18]  Todd D. Little,et al.  A Non-arbitrary Method of Identifying and Scaling Latent Variables in SEM and MACS Models , 2006 .

[19]  Debra Mashek,et al.  Closeness as Including Other in the Self. , 2004 .

[20]  Scott E. Caplan.  Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Harmeet Sawhney,et al.  Strategies for Increasing the Conceptual Yield of New Technologies Research , 2007 .

[22]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[23]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  University Students' Local And Distant Social Ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus , 2007 .

[24]  Sejung Marina Choi,et al.  The Role of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism in Online Consumers' Responses Toward Persuasive Communication on the Web , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Brian H. Spitzberg.  Preliminary Development of a Model and Measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Competence , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[27]  L. Kelly,et al.  Development of the Affect for Communication Channels Scale , 2007 .

[28]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  The Quality of Online and Offline Relationships: The Role of Multiplexity and Duration of Social Relationships , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[29]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[30]  Debra Mashek,et al.  Handbook of closeness and intimacy , 2004 .

[31]  Aaron Smith and Lee Rainie.  The internet and the 2008 election , 2008 .

[32]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[33]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Sociability: A Time Diary Study , 2008 .

[34]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  Unconstrained Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions: Contrasting Residual- and Mean-Centered Approaches , 2007 .

[35]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[36]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Andrew M. Ledbetter.  Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation , 2009 .

[38]  Andrew M. Ledbetter,et al.  Forecasting “friends forever”: A longitudinal investigation of sustained closeness between best friends , 2007 .

[39]  Artemio Ramirez,et al.  `IM me': Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication , 2009 .

[40]  A. Joinson.  Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[41]  T. Little.  Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[42]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self-Disclosure. , 1976 .

[44]  Andrew M. Ledbetter.  Patterns of media use and multiplexity: associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence , 2009, New Media Soc..

[45]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[46]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Zeynep Tufekci.  GROOMING, GOSSIP, FACEBOOK AND MYSPACE , 2008 .

[48]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[49]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE USE AND ABUSE OF FACTOR ANALYSIS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1979 .

[50]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[51]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[52]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[53]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[54]  M. Rokeach,et al.  Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. A Theory of Organization and Change , 1968 .

[55]  Scott E. Caplan.  Relations Among Loneliness, Social Anxiety, and Problematic Internet Use , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[56]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Informational Reception Apprehension and Information from Technology Aversion: Development and Test of a New Construct , 2005 .

[57]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  I'll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate , 2007 .

[58]  Patrick B. O'Sullivan,et al.  What You Don't Know Won't Hurt Me:Impression Management Functions of Communication Channels in Relationships , 2000 .

[59]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  The Impact of Individualism—Collectivism, Social Presence, and Group Diversity on Group Decision Making Under Majority Influence , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Loneliness and social uses of the Internet , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[62]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[63]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[64]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[65]  Mark Zuckerberg,et al.  An Open Letter from Mark Zuckerberg , 2006 .

[66]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Revealing Family Secrets: The Influence of Topic, Function, and Relationships , 1997 .

[67]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[68]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[70]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents' Identity Experiments on the Internet , 2008, Commun. Res..

[71]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[72]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Relating Computer, Communication, and Computer-Mediated Communication Apprehensions to New Communication Technology Use in the Workplace , 2005, Commun. Res..

[73]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[74]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[75]  D. Annis.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2007 .

[76]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[77]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[79]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[80]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[81]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[82]  Zeynep Tufekcioglu.  Grooming, gossip, facebook and myspace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won't assimilate? , 2008 .