Estimation and analysis of GPS satellite DCB based on LEO observations

Abstract The Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite differential code bias (DCB) should be precisely calibrated when obtaining ionospheric slant total electron content (TEC). So far, it is ground-based GPS observations that have been used to estimate GPS satellite DCB. With the increased Low Earth Orbit (LEO) missions in the near future, the real-time satellite DCB estimation is a crucial factor in real-time LEO GPS data applications. One alternative way is estimating GPS DCB based on the LEO observations themselves, instead of using ground observations. We propose an approach to estimate the satellite DCB based on Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) and Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) GPS observations during the years 2002–2012. The results have been validated through comparisons with those issued by Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE). The evaluations indicate that: The approach can estimate satellite DCB in a reasonable way; the DCB estimated based on CHAMP observations is much better than those on COSMIC observations; the accuracy and precision of DCB show a possible dependency on the ionospheric ionization level. This method is significance for the real-time processing of LEO-based GNSS TEC data from the perspective of real-time applications.

[1]  A. Garcia-Rigo,et al.  The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998 , 2009 .

[2]  Zuo Xiao,et al.  Accuracy analysis of the GPS instrumental bias estimated from observations in middle and low latitudes , 2010 .

[3]  Norbert Jakowski,et al.  A new global model for the ionospheric F2 peak height for radio wave propagation , 2012 .

[4]  Urs Hugentobler,et al.  Assessing antenna field of view and receiver clocks of COSMIC and GRACE satellites: lessons for COSMIC-2 , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[5]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The influence of geomagnetic storms on the estimation of GPS instrumental biases , 2009 .

[6]  Joachim Feltens,et al.  The activities of the Ionosphere Working Group of the International GPS Service (IGS) , 2003 .

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[8]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  An Automatic Editing Algorithm for GPS data , 1990 .

[9]  X. Qiao,et al.  An ionospheric occultation inversion technique based on epoch difference , 2013 .

[10]  Byung-Kyu Choi,et al.  Estimation and analysis of GPS receiver differential code biases using KGN in Korean Peninsula , 2011 .

[11]  A. Rius,et al.  Estimation of the transmitter and receiver differential biases and the ionospheric total electron content from Global Positioning System observations , 1994 .

[12]  Gottfried Kirchengast,et al.  A simple “geometric” mapping function for the hydrostatic delay at radio frequencies and assessment of its performance , 2002 .

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 , 1992 .

[14]  Joseph E. Salah,et al.  A global thermospheric model based on mass spectrometer and incoherent scatter data MSIS, 1. N2 density and temperature , 1977 .

[15]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Quality assessment of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and GRACE GPS observables: analysis of multipath, ionospheric delay and phase residual in orbit determination , 2010 .

[16]  Anthea J. Coster,et al.  Automated GPS processing for global total electron content data , 2006 .

[17]  Xinan Yue,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the low Earth orbit satellite based slant total electron content determination , 2011 .

[18]  Douglas Hunt,et al.  Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT‐3 mission , 2007 .

[19]  Allan T. Weatherwax,et al.  Accuracy of GPS total electron content: GPS receiver bias temperature dependence , 2013 .

[20]  Zishen Li,et al.  Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.