Impact of the Primary Break-Up Strategy on the Morphology of GDI Sprays in 3D-CFD Simulations of Multi-Hole Injectors

The scientific literature focusing on the numerical simulation of fuel sprays is rich in atomization and secondary break-up models. However, it is well known that the predictive capability of even the most diffused models is affected by the combination of injection parameters and operating conditions, especially backpressure. In this paper, an alternative atomization strategy is proposed for the 3D-Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) sprays, aiming at extending simulation predictive capabilities over a wider range of operating conditions. In particular, attention is focused on the effects of back pressure, which has a remarkable impact on both the morphology and the sizing of GDI sprays. 3D-CFD Lagrangian simulations of two different multi-hole injectors are presented. The first injector is a 5-hole GDI prototype unit operated at ambient conditions. The second one is the well-known Spray G, characterized by a higher back pressure (up to 0.6 MPa). Numerical results are compared against experiments in terms of liquid penetration and Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) data of droplet sizing/velocity and imaging. CFD results are demonstrated to be highly sensitive to spray vessel pressure, mainly because of the atomization strategy. The proposed alternative approach proves to strongly reduce such dependency. Moreover, in order to further validate the alternative primary break-up strategy adopted for the initialization of the droplets, an internal nozzle flow simulation is carried out on the Spray G injector, able to provide information on the characteristic diameter of the liquid column exiting from the nozzle.

[1]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[2]  F. Bracco.  Modeling of engine sprays , 1985 .

[3]  R. Reitz,et al.  Measurements of drop size at the spray edge near the nozzle in atomizing liquid jets , 1986 .

[4]  R. Reitz,et al.  Effect of drop breakup on fuel sprays , 1986 .

[5]  F. Menter.  ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS , 1993 .

[6]  R. Reitz,et al.  Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG κ-ε Models , 1995 .

[7]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Fuel Spray Characteristics on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission , 1998 .

[8]  A. Leipertz,et al.  Flash Boiling Effects on the Development of Gasoline Direct-Injection Engine Sprays , 2002 .

[9]  R. Reitz,et al.  Reduction of Numerical Parameter Dependencies in Diesel Spray Models , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Liao,et al.  A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions , 2009 .

[11]  K. Raja Gopal,et al.  In-cylinder fluid flow, turbulence and spray models—A review , 2009 .

[12]  R. Reitz,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Diesel Sprays Using an Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray and Atomization (ELSA) Model Coupled with Nozzle Flow , 2011 .

[13]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  Application and Evaluation of the Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray Atomization (ELSA) Model on CFD Diesel Spray Simulations , 2011 .

[14]  R. Reitz,et al.  Computational Optimization of Internal Combustion Engines , 2011 .

[15]  S. Subramaniam.  Lagrangian-Eulerian methods for multiphase flows , 2013 .

[16]  P. Senecal,et al.  Validation of a Three-Dimensional Internal Nozzle Flow Model Including Automatic Mesh Generation and Cavitation Effects , 2013 .

[17]  A. Montanaro,et al.  Spray Characterization of a Single-Hole Gasoline Injector under Flash Boiling Conditions , 2014 .

[18]  S. Parrish.  Evaluation of Liquid and Vapor Penetration of Sprays from a Multi-Hole Gasoline Fuel Injector Operating Under Engine-Like Conditions , 2014 .

[19]  B. Vaglieco,et al.  Split Injection in a GDI Engine Under Knock Conditions: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation , 2015 .

[20]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Effects on knock intensity and specific fuel consumption of port water/methanol injection in a turbocharged GDI engine: Comparative analysis , 2015 .

[21]  Fabio Berni,et al.  A Numerical Investigation on the Potentials of Water Injection to Increase Knock Resistance and Reduce Fuel Consumption in Highly Downsized GDI Engines , 2015 .

[22]  R. Payri,et al.  Momentum Flux Measurements on an ECN GDi Injector , 2015 .

[23]  Fabio Berni,et al.  A Numerical Investigation on the Potentials of Water Injection as a Fuel Efficiency Enhancer in Highly Downsized GDI Engines , 2015 .

[24]  A. Montanaro,et al.  Flash Boiling Evidences of a Multi-Hole GDI Spray under Engine Conditions by Mie-Scattering Measurements , 2015 .

[25]  Fabio Berni,et al.  Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Water/Methanol Injection as Knock Suppressor to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of a Highly Downsized GDI Engine , 2015 .

[26]  P. Senecal,et al.  A One-Way Coupled Volume of Fluid and Eulerian-Lagrangian Method for Simulating Sprays , 2016 .

[27]  Fabio Berni,et al.  Integrated In-Cylinder / CHT Methodology for the Simulation of the Engine Thermal Field: An Application to High Performance Turbocharged DISI Engines , 2016 .

[28]  Fabio Berni,et al.  A modified thermal wall function for the estimation of gas-to-wall heat fluxes in CFD in-cylinder simulations of high performance spark-ignition engines , 2017 .

[29]  E. Andreoli,et al.  A Comprehensive CFD-CHT Methodology for the Characterization of a Diesel Engine: From the Heat Transfer Prediction to the Thermal Field Evaluation , 2017 .

[30]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  ECN Spray G external spray visualization and spray collapse description through penetration and morphology analysis , 2017 .

[31]  Fabio Berni,et al.  An Experimental and Simulation Study of Early Flame Development in a Homogeneous-charge Spark-Ignition Engine , 2017 .

[32]  L. Postrioti,et al.  Injection Rate Measurement of GDI Systems Operating against Sub-Atmospheric and Pressurized Downstream Conditions , 2017 .

[33]  A. d’Adamo,et al.  Critical Aspects on the Use of Thermal Wall Functions in CFD In-Cylinder Simulations of Spark-Ignition Engines , 2017 .

[34]  D. Schmidt,et al.  Internal and near nozzle measurements of Engine Combustion Network “Spray G” gasoline direct injectors , 2017 .

[35]  N. Sheikh,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of flash boiling in gasoline direct injection sprays , 2017 .

[36]  Sebastiano Breda,et al.  Understanding the Origin of Cycle-to-Cycle Variation Using Large-Eddy Simulation: Similarities and Differences between a Homogeneous Low-Revving Speed Research Engine and a Production DI Turbocharged Engine , 2018, SAE International Journal of Engines.

[37]  Felix Leach,et al.  A Review of Particulate Number (PN) Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engines and Their Control Techniques , 2018, Energies.

[38]  S. Cordiner,et al.  ECN Spray G Injector: Assessment of Numerical Modeling Accuracy , 2018 .

[39]  S. Fontanesi,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Spray Evolution, Hydraulics and Atomization for a 60 MPa Injection Pressure GDI System , 2018 .

[40]  S. Merola,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on the adoption of split injection strategies to improve air-butanol mixture formation in a DISI optical engine , 2019, Fuel.

[41]  Fabio Berni,et al.  The potential of statistical RANS to predict knock tendency: Comparison with LES and experiments on a spark-ignition engine , 2019, Applied Energy.