Digital mammography: hybrid four-channel wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The authors evaluated an algorithm for the automatic segmentation of microcalcification clusters (MCCs) at digital mammography. Two- and four-channel wavelet transforms were evaluated to determine whether sensitivity in the detection of MCCs can be improved and if the selective reconstruction of the higher-order M2 subimages allows better preservation of the segmented MCCs, which is required for their classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS The hybrid method involved the use of a nonlinear filter for image noise suppression coupled with wavelet transforms for image decomposition and an adaptive method for selective subimage reconstruction as a basis for segmentation of MCCs. The two- and four-channel wavelet transforms were implemented with different filter bank structures (i.e., polyphase quadrature mirror filters [QMFs], tree structure, and lattice structure) to determine if their computational efficiency can be improved while retaining properties such as near-perfect reconstruction. The hybrid wavelet transforms were applied to a common image database of biopsy-proved MCCs (100 images, 105-micron resolution, 12 bits deep; 52 cases with at least one MCC of varying subtlety [46 malignant and six benign cases] and eight normal cases). RESULTS The two- and four-channel wavelet transforms yielded sensitivities of 93% and 94% and false-positive (PP) detection rates of 1.58 and 1.35 MCCs per image, respectively. The lattice structure provided greater than fivefold improvement in computational speed compared to the polyphase QMF structure, particularly for the higher order of channels (M = 4). CONCLUSION The four-channel wavelet transform provided better sensitivity and FP detection rates and greater image detail preservation for the segmented MCCs.

[1]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Wavelets for contrast enhancement of digital mammography , 1995 .

[2]  Walter B. Richardson Wavelet packets applied to mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  ADAPTIVE NOISE EQUALIZATION AND RECOGNITION OF MICROCALCIFICATION CLUSTERS IN MAMMOGRAMS , 1993 .

[4]  Carey E. Priebe,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY , 1993 .

[5]  D. Dance,et al.  Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC CALCIFICATIONS , 1993 .

[7]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks: theory and design , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Wei Qian,et al.  Tree-structured nonlinear filters in digital mammography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Baoyu Zheng,et al.  Computer assisted diagnosis for digital mammography , 1995 .

[11]  L. Clarke,et al.  Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[12]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[13]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Theory and design of M-channel maximally decimated quadrature mirror filters with arbitrary M, having the perfect-reconstruction property , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  Peter N. Heller,et al.  Theory of regular M-band wavelet bases , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  P. Vaidyanathan Multirate Systems And Filter Banks , 1992 .

[16]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Ping Lu,et al.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[20]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  The Generalized Gabor Scheme of Image Representation in Biological and Machine Vision , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..